Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Bihar vs Md. Kamal Ashraf
2025 Latest Caselaw 3961 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3961 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2025

Patna High Court

The State Of Bihar vs Md. Kamal Ashraf on 24 September, 2025

Author: Sudhir Singh
Bench: Sudhir Singh, Rajesh Kumar Verma
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Letters Patent Appeal No.163 of 2023
                                          In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12317 of 2011
     ======================================================
1.    The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Finance, Govt.
      of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Principal Secretary Registration, Excise and Prohibition Deptt., Govt. of
     Bihar, Patna.

                                                                 ... ... Appellant/s
                                        Versus

     Md. Kamal Ashraf, Son of Late Syed Abdul Nadeem, R/o- MH-A-8, Ali
     Nagar Colony, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Appellant/s    :      Mr.Rewti Kant Raman (A.C. To S.C.11)
     For the Respondent/s   :
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

Date : 24-09-2025

The present intra-court appeal has been filed by the

appellants/State of Bihar against the judgment dated 21.09.2022,

passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 12317 of

2011, whereby the writ petition was disposed of holding the

entitlement of the petitioner for interest @ 6% per annum from

1st August, 2011 till 11.08.2022, the date on which the medical

reimbursement has been settled in full and if the interest is not

paid within the stipulated period, the petitioner shall also be

entitled to litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/-. Patna High Court L.P.A No.163 of 2023 dt.24-09-2025

2. The facts on record are that the

petitioner/respondent herein was admitted in emergency at

Jevak Heart Hospital, Patna where his angiography was

conducted and three arteries were found blocked. The doctor

advised him to undergo bypass surgery as soon as possible.

Thereafter, the petitioner approached AIIMS, New Delhi for

operation but immediate accommodation was not available.

Thereafter, he was admitted in ESCORT Heart Hospital, New

Delhi where he underwent successful bypass surgery and was

discharged on 29.01.2009. On 21.10.2009, the petitioner applied

for reimbursement of medical expenses amounting to Rs.

5,59,772/-. However, vide letter no. 846 dated 21.03.2011,

petitioner's claim was rejected on the ground that prior

permission was not taken from the Department for treatment

outside the State of Bihar, which is in violation of the

Notification dated 20.05.2006 of the Health Department.

Aggrieved by this, the petitioner preferred CWJC No. 12317 of

2011 seeking reimbursement of the aforesaid medical expenses.

3. The learned Single Judge found that during the

pendency of the writ petition, petitioner's claim has been settled

in respect of medical reimbursement on 11.08.2022. The learned

Single Judge further held that since there was belated settlement Patna High Court L.P.A No.163 of 2023 dt.24-09-2025

on the part of the concerned respondent, petitioner is entitled to

interest on the belated settlement of medical reimbursement and

directed the respondents/appellants herein to pay interest at the

rate of 6% per annum from 1st August, 2011 till 11.08.2022, the

date on which medical reimbursement has been settled in full.

The said interest was to be paid within a period of two months

from the date of the order of the learned Single Judge. The

learned Single Judge further held that if interest is not paid

within the stipulated period, the petitioner shall be entitled to

litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/-.

4. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, the present

appeal has been preferred.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that

the delay in reimbursement was partly attributable to the

respondent as he had not countersigned the documents as also

had not complied the terms and conditions stipulated in the

Notification dated 20.05.2006. It is further submitted that before

filing the writ petition, the respondent could have approached

the authority concerned under the Bihar Litigation Policy, 2011

and avoided the litigation, but since the respondent did not do

so, the appellants herein could not pay the concerned amount as

the matter was sub-judice. Further, the learned counsel for the Patna High Court L.P.A No.163 of 2023 dt.24-09-2025

appellants submitted that after an order of the learned Single

Judge, the appellants immediately reimbursed the amount to

him on 11.08.2022, and therefore, appellants cannot be held

responsible for the delay by imposition of interest at the rate of

6% in addition to the litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/-.

6. It is undisputed that the respondent herein is

entitled to the amount for reimbursement of his medical

expenses, and the same had been paid by the concerned

department when the writ petition was pending. The singular

question before the writ court was that whether the respondent

herein was entitled for the interest on the amount of medical

reimbursement which had already been settled by the concerned

department. The said question was answered in affirmative by

the learned Single Judge taking into account the inaction of the

appellants (respondent therein).

7. For a period of almost 13 years, there was non-

payment of the medical reimbursement by the appellants and the

respondent had to approach this court for settlement of medical

reimbursement. The arguments of the appellants cannot be

accepted by this court, as the appellants themselves made the

payment of the amount in pendency of litigation. Thus, the

claim of the respondent has not been disputed and the claim of Patna High Court L.P.A No.163 of 2023 dt.24-09-2025

the respondent was delayed due to inaction on part of the

appellants.

8. Therefore, we are of the view that the learned

Single Judge has rightly held the petitioner entitled for interest

on the reimbursement amount.

9. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere

with the order of the learned Single Judge, and the present

appeal stands dismissed.

10. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand

disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J)

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Sujit/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          27.09.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter