Patna High Court
Khushboo Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 22 September, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9202 of 2019
======================================================
Khushboo Kumari W/o Chandan Sao Vill.- Banpur, P.s.- Khaira, Distt.- Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar Food and Supply
Department, Bihar, Patna
2. The District collector Jamui
3. The District Supply Officer Bihar State Food and Supply Department
4. The Sub Divisional Officer Jamui cum Sub Divisional Supply Officer Jamui
5. The Supply Officer Block Khaira Distt.- Jamui, Bihar State Food and
Supply Department, Bihar, patna
6. Pinki Kumari D/o Shyam Sundar Sah W/o Kumar Nehru, resident of Village
Banpur P.s.- Khaira, Distt.- Jamui
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (Sc4)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-09-2025
1. The Writ petition is filed for the following
reliefs:-
"That this writ application is
being filed by the petitioner who is an
applicant for license of shop of Public
distribution system at Banpur Block
Khaira District Jamui, Bihar for issuance
mandamus to the respondents for
cancelled the license of P.D.S dealer of
respondent No.6 who has mislead to
the proceedings and suppress the fact
that who is living at Delhi not at the
Patna High Court CWJC No.9202 of 2019 dt.22-09-2025
village Banpur and also suppress the
education and produced the forged
certificate and respondent authority
has not taken any action against
respondent no. 6 while petitioner is
entitled for licence therefore petitioner
prefer this appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders, direction/directions to the
respondents as your Lordships may
deem fit in the interest of Justice."
2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for
the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the
Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)
Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and
Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public
Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides
for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and
32(vi) read as follows:
"32 (iii). Any person aggrieved
by an order of the licensing authority
denying the issue or renewal of the
license to the fair price shop owner or
cancellation of the license may appeal to
the District Officer within thirty days of
the date of receipt of the order and the
District Magistrate shall, as far as
Patna High Court CWJC No.9202 of 2019 dt.22-09-2025
practicable, dispose the appeal within a
period of sixty days."
32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal
pending, the Appellate Authority may
direct that the order under appeal shall
not take effect for such period as the
authority may consider necessary for
giving a reasonable opportunity to the
other party under sub-clause (4) or until
the appeal is disposed of, whichever is
earlier.
(vi) Due to non disposal of the
appeal within sixty days by the District
Officer or against the order passed in the
appeal, a revision may be filed before
the Divisional Commissioner. The
revision shall be disposed of within two
months.
3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in
the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has
an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar
Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,
2016.
4. The remedy available under the Act is to
prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As
the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection
Patna High Court CWJC No.9202 of 2019 dt.22-09-2025
Committee, he cannot review his orders in an
appeal. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a
complaint/application before the Divisional
Commissioner.
5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner
contended that he intends to file a
complaint/application before the concerned
authority, but the limitation period for filing the
same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the
concerned authority to entertain the same in
accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
6. Taking into consideration that the
petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing
complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed
of with a direction to the petitioner to file
complaint/application within one month from the
date of receipt of this order before the concerned
authority. The delay in filing the complaint/
application shall be condoned by the authority
concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the
same within three months from the date of filing of
the same.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9202 of 2019 dt.22-09-2025
7. With the above said observation, the Writ
petition is disposed of.
8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
AMANDEEP/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date 24.09.2025
Transmission Date
