Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Indian Infratech vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 3786 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3786 Patna
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2025

Patna High Court

Indian Infratech vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2025

Author: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
Bench: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9473 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Indian Infratech a registered partnership firm, having its registered office at 1 st
     Floor, Shop no.- 22, Church Complex in front of Andrews Inter College,
     Shastri Chowk, Gorakhpur, P.S.- Cantt. Gorakhpur District- Gorakhpur-
     273001 (U.P.) through its constituted attorney, Santosh Kumar, Male, aged
     about 39 years, son of Sri. Lalan Singh, resident of Village- Dhandhua, Ward
     No.- 10, Bishunpur Ragho, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali- 844504 Bihar.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and
     Prohibition, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Begusarai.
4.   The Senior Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.
5.   The Station House Officer, Barauni Police Station, Begusarai.
6.   Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Barauni, District- Begusarai

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner        :       Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Senior Advocate
                                       Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate
                                       Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate
                                       Mr. Ganga Prasad Bimal, Advocate
     For the State             :       Mr. Kumar Alok, Standing Counsel (07)
     For the IOC               :       Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

      Date : 15-09-2025


                     The present writ application has been filed seeking the

     following reliefs:-

                          "(i) Issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the
                          respondents to forthwith release tanker bearing
                          registration no.UP53T8533 along with 25,000 liters of
                          Ethanol, which has been seized in connection with
                          Barauni (Zeromile) O.P. Case No.80 of 2025 dated
 Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025
                                           2/8




                         17.05.2025

, instituted under Section 30(a), 33, 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and 303(2)/62 of BNS which was lawfully being transported from M/s Westwell Biorefinery Pvt. Ltd., Gopalganj (Bihar) to Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery, District-Begusarai (Bihar), on the strength of valid documents/permits;

(ii) To restrain the respondents from destruction of 25000 liters of Ethanol stored in the tanker, which has been seized in connection with Barauni (Zeromile) O.P. Case No.80 of 20025 dated 17.05.2025, as the consignment was lawfully being transported to Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery, District-Begusarai, on the strength of valid documents/permits.

(iii) To pass such other order(s), direction(s) as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is

engaged in transportation services and being owner of fleet of

tankers which are registered with the Bihar Excise Department for

transporting alcohol related products in the State of Bihar, the firm

of the petitioner is engaged in providing transportation services

from the distillery of M/s Westwell Bio-refineries Private Limited

Rajapatti, Kiioti, District-Gopalganj to the Indian Oil Corporation

Ltd. for blending with petrol.

3. It is submitted that in the present case the tanker of

the petitioner was loaded with ethanol which was to be delivered

at the destination i.e. Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery.

The tanker started its journey on 15.05.2025 at around 7.00 PM

and it reached its destination at 8.30 AM on the next day, recorded Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

its arrival and was waiting on the road for its turn for unloading

the tanker. It is stated that some times the waiting time is more

than 24 hours. According to the petitioner, while the tanker was

stationed near the destination with the digital lock and GPS of the

vehicle affixed on the tanker, it was intercepted by the police

officials of Barauni (Zeromile) O.P. District-Begusarai making a

false and concocted allegation that the driver had intended to

unload ethanol loaded with the tanker, he seized the tanker

containing 25000 liters of ethanol and lodged Barauni (Zero Mile)

OP Case No.80 of 2025 dated 17.05.2025 registered under under

Section 30(a), 33, 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

2016 and Section 303(2)/62 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Sanhita (BNS).

The entire quantity of 25000 liters of ethanol was found to be

loaded on the tanker at the time of seizure.

4. It is submitted that the ethanol which is loaded on the

tanker is not an intoxicant or liquor. It is industrial alcohol, unfit

for human consumption and used for blending with petrol under

the National Biofuel Policy, 2018 of the Government of India.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

consignment of ethanol could not have been seized by the police

alleging violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act as it is a

raw material for blending with petrol. Thus, the police officials Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

had absolutely no jurisdiction to seize the consignment of ethanol.

The petitioner has enclosed with the writ petition a copy of the

GPS and digital lock report (Annexure-P/9) to submit that it would

demonstrate that the consignment was being lawfully transported

but the police officials in a mischievous act has seized the tanker

containing ethanol which ought to have been delivered to IOCL.

6. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

respondent no.4, which has been sworn by the Deputy

Superintendent of Police (Reserve), Begusarai. According to

respondent no.4, Zero Mile (O.P.) Incharge, namely, Chandrakant

Kumar got a secret information that ethanol/spirit is being taken

out from the tanker by some persons in the way of BPCL Campus

road under the jurisdiction of Zero Mile O.P. On this information,

a raid was conducted and it was found that 3-4 persons were trying

to commit theft of ethanol by taking out from the tanker bearing

Reg. No.UP53T8533 and a silver colour Maruti Suzuki Omni four-

wheeler having Reg. No. BR09T7340 was standing near the

tanker. On seeing the police party, all the persons were trying to

flee away but with the help of other police officials one person was

apprehended who disclosed his name as Amit Kumar, he was a

driver of the said tanker but others managed to escape and fled

away.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

7. It is submitted that the investigating officer has

recorded the statement of the witnesses and all the witnesses have

supported the prosecution case. It has been found that the lid of the

upper chamber was open despite the digital lock was intact and a

Maruti Suzuki Omni four-wheeler was kept parking beside there.

The said place was three kilometer away from the destination

place and from the seizure list, it may be found that from the said

Omni four-wheeler, 15 empty Jarkin along with a 2 inch pipe of 15

feet in length was also found and the apprehended person has

disclosed that for commitment of theft, the tanker with ethanol was

standing there. The tanker was built in such a way that despite

there being a digital lock the lid of the upper chamber can be

opened, which goes to show that there is involvement of tanker

owner and also shows that despite being a digital lock there is

another way created by the persons who are involved in such type

of theft of ethanol from the tanker.

8. The petitioner has contested the statements of

respondent no.4 by filing a rejoinder. The respondent no.4 has also

filed a supplementary counter affidavit.

9. Be that as it may, in course of hearing of the writ

application, learned counsel for the State submitted that without

prejudice to the contentions of the State, the State would have no Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

objection if the tanker with loaded ethanol be released provided

the Court is assured by the petitioner that the loaded ethanol will

be delivered to the Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery for

which the consignment was meant. Learned counsel for the State

has further submitted that while releasing the tanker in question in

favour of the petitioner, appropriate order be passed directing the

learned court below to get prepared a panchanama of the seized

vehicle in presence of two witnesses, photograph of the vehicle in

present condition be obtained, the panchnama and photograph be

kept on the trial court records for use in course of trial and the

petitioner must submit an undertaking that it would not question

the identity of the tanker and the panchnama so prepared at this

stage, in course of trial. It is also submitted that after getting

release of the tanker, the petitioner would not modify the physical

features of the tanker in any form during the trial.

10. Mr. Satyabir Bharti, learned senior counsel for the

petitioner took a stand that the petitioner would be ready to submit

an undertaking to the effect called upon by learned counsel for the

State and then the loaded ethanol shall be delivered to the Indian

Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery immediately after release.

11. In view of what transpired in course of hearing, this

Court adjourned the matter on 12.09.2025 to enable learned Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

counsel for the petitioner and the State (SC-7) to request Mr. Ankit

Katriar, learned Advocate who is representing Indian Oil

Corporation, Barauni Refinery in this Court to be present with

instruction as to whether Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery

would receive the ethanol loaded on the tanker in question.

12. Today, Mr. Ankit Katriar, learned counsel for the

Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery has appeared before this

Court and submitted on instruction that Indian Oil Corporation,

Barauni Refinery is ready to take delivery of 25000 liters of

ethanol which is said to be loaded on the tanker. In view of the

said statement, this Court directed that Indian Oil Corporation,

Barauni Refinery be made party respondent no.6 in this case. Mr.

Ankit Katriar, learned counsel accepted the notice on behalf of

newly added Respondent No. 6. This Court has already recorded

his statement hereinabove.

13. Having regard to the pleadings available on the

record and the submissions made by learned counsel for the

parties, this Court directs release of the tanker bearing registration

no. UP53T8533 with loaded ethanol in favour of the petitioner

immediately. The petitioner shall deliver the loaded ethanol to the

Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni Refinery.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9473 of 2025 dt.15-09-2025

14. Before release of the vehicle with loaded ethanol, the

following requirements shall be fulfilled:-

(i) A panchnama of the vehicle with loaded ethanol shall

be prepared in presence of the two independent witnesses.

(ii) The photograph of the vehicle shall be taken in

presence of the petitioner or its authorized representative.

(iii) The petitioner shall submit an appropriate

undertaking to the satisfaction of the learned jurisdictional court

that it would not question the identity of the vehicle and the

correctness of the panchnama and the photographs in course of

trial while exhibiting those documents by the prosecution, if so

advised.

15. In terms of the order aforesaid, this writ application

is allowed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

(Sourendra Pandey, J) lekhi/arvind/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date             18.09.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter