Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 3687 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3687 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2025

Patna High Court

Dharmendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 8 September, 2025

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23256 of 2018
     ======================================================
     Dharmendra Kumar Son of Ramudgar Yadav Resident of Village Jatahi Ward
     No. 1, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani
                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                         Versus
1.    The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Food and Consumer Supply
      Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2.   The Collector Madhubani
3.   The Subs Divisional officer Fulparas, Madhubani
4.   The Block Supply Officer, Khutauna , Madhubani
5.   Ram Naresh Yadav
6.    Ram Vilash Yadav both are sons of Rambahadur Yadav Resident of village-
      Jatahi, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani
                                                          ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.
                                   Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.S. Raza Ahmad- Aag5
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 08-09-2025

1. The Writ petition is filed for the

following reliefs:-

"For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), for direction to the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for grant of license of PDS shop under Parsahi Gram Panchayat as other candidates of merit list did not fulfill the requirement of license of PDS shop and to grant license of PDS shop to the petitioner and to grant any other consequential benefits for which petitioner may be found entitled in accordance with law."

Patna High Court CWJC No.23256 of 2018 dt.08-09-2025

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and

Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides

for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and

32(vi) read as follows:

"32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days."

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

Patna High Court CWJC No.23256 of 2018 dt.08-09-2025

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection

Committee, he cannot review his orders in an

appeal. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the Patna High Court CWJC No.23256 of 2018 dt.08-09-2025

same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the complaint/

application shall be condoned by the authority

concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the

same within three months from the date of filing of

the same.

7. With the above said observation, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) AMANDEEP/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          10.09.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter