Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Poonam Rani Sinha vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4059 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4059 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Poonam Rani Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 9 October, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4585 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Poonam Rani Sinha Wife of Late Dr. Mithilesh Kumar Sinha Resident of
     Opposite of Block Office Hisua, P.O. and P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada.

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
     Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya.
4.   The District Education Officer, Nawada.
5.   The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nawada.
6.   The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Ram Sagar Singh
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Standing Counsel 23
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                         ORAL JUDGMENT
     Date : 09-10-2025
               Heard the parties.

                 2. The petitioner has prayed this Court for the

      following reliefs:

                   "That this is an application for issuance of
                   appropriate writ(s)/direction(s) for quashing
                   in part the letter as contained in Memo
                   No.1082 dated 21.06.2021 issued by the
                   respondent no.2 by which Monetary benefits
                   (dues of salary as well as death-cum-post
                   retirement benefits) of the petitioner's
                   husband has been paid to the petitioner in
                   untrained pay scale instead of graduate
                   trained pay-scale and further for
                   commanding the respondents to pay all
                   monetary benefits to the petitioner in
 Patna High Court CWJC No.4585 of 2024 dt.09-10-2025
                                           2/3




                      graduate trained pay scale for which her
                      Late husband was entitled and also for grant
                      of all other consequential benefits including
                      revision of family pension of the petitioner."

                    3. Shorn of details, learned Advocate for the petitioner

         submitted that the issue has now been set at rest by various

         decisions of this Court, copies of which have been placed as

         Annexures P/12, P/13 and P/18 to the writ petition. It is

         submitted that in pursuant to the order passed in CWJC No.

         1290 of 2021, LPA No. 280 of 2021 and CWJC No. 5134 of

         2023, other identically situated persons have been allowed the

         Graduate Trained pay scale. The names of the identically

         situated persons have also been disclosed in para-6 of the

         rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent

         nos. 1 and 2 by the petitioner. He further submits that

         subsequent thereto, with respect to other identically situated

         persons, who have approached this Court in CWJC No. 17970

         of 2022, further in CWJC No. 187 of 2024, they have also been

         allowed the identical benefit after setting aside the impunged

         order.

                    4. Though a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf

         of respondent nos. 1 and 2 and also on behalf of respondent nos.

         4 and 5 in opposition to the submission made by the learned

         Advocate for the petitioner.
              Patna High Court CWJC No.4585 of 2024 dt.09-10-2025
                                                        3/3




                                 5. Considering the submissions advanced that the issue

                      has already been given quietus by this Court through various

                      pronouncements, this Court deems it fit and proper to set aside

                      the part of the letter as contained in Memo No. 1082 dated

                      21.06.2021

and relegate the matter to the respondent no. 2 to

look into the grievance of the petitioner and ensure all

consequential benefits, if the case of the petitioner finds favour

in terms with the decisions of this Court noted hereinabove,

preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

6. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date            10.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter