Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raushan Tara vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2449 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2449 Patna
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2025

Patna High Court

Raushan Tara vs The State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri, Alok Kumar Sinha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.836 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Raushan Tara Wife of Shekh Gafar, Resident of Village- Shekh Dhurwa, P.O.-
     Khairatiya, Bettiah Dih, P.S.- Manuapul, District- West Champaran.


                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise of
     Prohibition, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
4.   The District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.
5.   The Additional District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.
6.   The Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran.
7.   The Oficer-in-Charge-cum-SHO, Sikta, District- Bettiah, West Champaran.


                                                              ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Government Pleader (14)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

      Date : 26-03-2025


                  In the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for

      the following relief:-

                                    "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/s,
                        order/s, direction/s in the nature of mandamus
                        commanding the respondent to released the vehicle of the
                        petitioner Honda Shine motor cycle, bearing Reg. No.
                        BR-22-AU-9028 Chassis No. ME4JC856CMD145867,
                        Engine No. JC85ED0340710, which was seized in
 Patna High Court CWJC No.836 of 2025 dt.26-03-2025
                                           2/4




                            connection with Sikta P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023 dated
                            19.10.2023

for registered offences under sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016.

(ii) To pass such other order/orders as your lordships may deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case."

2. The petitioner vehicle bearing no. BR-22-AU-9028

was stolen by some unknown miscreants, resultantly petitioner

had registered FIR Bettiah Nagar P.S. Case No. 731 of 2023.

Thereafter the same vehicle was involved for the offences under

Excise Act for which Sikta P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023 was

registered on 19.10.2023.

3. In this backdrop, the official respondents should

have released the subject matter vehicle in favour of the

petitioner after analyzing the factual aspects of the matter. On

the other hand, they have proceeded to confiscate the subject

matter of the vehicle and confiscation proceedings have been

completed on 18.06.2024. The confiscating authority has not

applied its mind to the extent that petitioner is not involved for

the offences under Excise Act in view of the fact that the subject

matter vehicle was stolen prior to 19.10.2023, therefore, it is

evident that some miscreants have used the vehicle. In this

backdrop, the concerned respondent is hereby directed to release

the subject matter vehicle in favour of the petitioner within a Patna High Court CWJC No.836 of 2025 dt.26-03-2025

period of one week from today.

4. The petitioner is entitled to litigation cost and it is

quantified at Rs. 25,000/- for the reason that the petitioner has

been unnecessarily harassed and the vehicle has been seized for

more than a year and compelling him to invoke remedy before

this Court in filling the present writ petition.

5. Time and again, this Court has held that insofar as

seizure of the stolen vehicle, the concerned authority was

required to examine whether the vehicle is involved for the

offences under Excise Act or not. If he/she is not involved in

such excise offences in that event, in all fairness, the vehicle

should have been released in favour of the owner with rider to

the extent that whenever the vehicle is wanted for inspection

insofar as offences under Excise Act alleged to have been

committed by some miscreants other than the owner of the

vehicle.

6. The petitioner is hereby directed to co-operate with

the official respondent/s in the event of production of vehicle

and its documents at any stage insofar as Sikta P.S. Case No.

123 of 2023 registered on 19.10.2023 is concerned.

7. The cost shall be paid within a period of two

months from the date of receipt of this order.

Patna High Court CWJC No.836 of 2025 dt.26-03-2025

8. With the above observation, the writ petition stands

disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Alok Kumar Sinha, J) ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          28.03.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter