Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Ishwar And Co. Contract Pvt. Ltd vs The Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 2246 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2246 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2025

Patna High Court

M/S Ishwar And Co. Contract Pvt. Ltd vs The Union Of India on 18 March, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri, Alok Kumar Sinha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10638 of 2024
     ======================================================
     M/s Ishwar and Co. Contract Pvt. Ltd through its proprietor Bikesh Kumar,
     aged about 40 years, son of Shayam Deo Kumar, residence of Gokhle nagar,
     Bishanpur, ward no 5, Gokhle Nagar, Bishanpur, Tajpur, Begusarai.

                                                            ... ... Petitioner.
                                        Versus
1.   The Union of India through Its Principal Chief Commissioner of Central
     Excise and Service tax, B.C. Patel Path, Patna.
2.   Assistant Commissioner central GST and Central Excise division Begusarai.

                                               ... ... Respondents.
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner     : Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Senior Advocate.
     For the Respondent-UOI : Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh, ASGI.
                              Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC, CGST & CX.
                              Mr. Mayank Mishra, JC to ASG.
                              Mr. Amarjeet, JC to ASG.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

      Date : 18-03-2025

                 In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for

      the following reliefs:

                                "(i) For setting aside the order dated
                     12.03.2024

passed by respondent number 2 by which he has raised the demand of service tax including cess amounting to ₹10,60,415/- not paid by the petitioner during the period financial year 2015-2016 and 2016-17 under proviso to section 73(2) of the Finance act read with Section 174 of CGST act 2017.

(ii) For setting aside the demand of interest at the applicable rate on the amount as Patna High Court CWJC No.10638 of 2024 dt.18-03-2025

demanded under the provisions of section 75 of the Finance act 1994 read with section 174 of the CGST act.

(iii) For setting aside the penalty of ₹ 10,60,415/- under the provisions of section 78 of the Finance act 1994 read with section 174 of the CGST act for wilful suppression of material facts with interest to evade payment to service tax.

(iv) For setting aside the penalty of ₹ 5000/- under the provisions of section 77(1)(a) of the Finance act 1994 read with section 174 of CGST act for failure to take registration in accordance with the provisions of section 69 of the act.

(v) For setting aside the penalty of ₹ 5000 under section 77(2) of the Finance act 1994. Read with section 174 of the CGST act for violation of the provision of section 70 of the act read with rule 7 of the rules.

(vi) For setting aside the penalty of ₹5000 under Section 77(2) of the Finance act read with section 174 of the CGST for violation of the provision of section 67 and 68 of the act.

(vii) For setting aside the penalty of ₹10,000/- under Section 77(1)(c)(ii) of the act read

with section 174 of the CGST act for failure to produce document as called for by the Department.

(viii) To issue an appropriate order/ direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent's authority not to take any course of Patna High Court CWJC No.10638 of 2024 dt.18-03-2025

action against the petitioner until the disposal of this writ petition.

(ix) To any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case during its hearing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

petitioner is not in receipt of show cause notices and personal

hearing notices and further submitted that issuance of show

cause notices itself is contrary to Circular dated 5th November,

2019, in particularly, paragraphs-2 and 4. The counsel for

Union of India, however submitted that the petitioner has

statutory remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority.

Without exhausting statutory remedy of appeal, petitioner has

rushed to this Court.

3. We could have interfered with the impugned order if

the petitioner's contention relating to non-service of notices, on

the other hand, petitioner is represented by his representative as

is evident from paragraph-8 relating to personal hearing in the

impugned order. Petitioner is represented by Shri Balram

Bharti, Chartered Accountant, an authorized representative of

the petitioner. In the light of representative of the petitioner

appeared before the Appellate Authority for personal hearing.

The contention of the petitioner that notices have not been Patna High Court CWJC No.10638 of 2024 dt.18-03-2025

served to the petitioner in the manner known to the law, is not

tenable. Insofar as consideration of Circular dated 5th

November, 2019, in particularly, paragraphs-2 and 4, is required

to be examined by the Appellate Authority. Therefore, instant

writ petition is premature. Accordingly, instant writ petition

stands disposed of in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of State of Jammu and Kashmir

Versus R.K. Zalpuri, reported in AIR 2016 Supreme Court

3006 (Para-20). The overall principle laid down in the

aforesaid decision is that if a person is having statutory remedy

of appeal before the Appellate Authority in that event he has to

exhaust such remedy. Writ Court can interfere only if there is

any violation of principles of natural justice and violation of any

statutory provision of law. Both the ingredients have not been

made out by the petitioner in the present case. Therefore, we

relegate the petitioner to the Appellate Authority insofar as

filing of appeal before the Appellate Authority. In the event of

filing of appeal before the Appellate Authority, Appellate

Authority is requested to decide the petitioner's appeal within a

reasonable period of time of six months from the date of receipt

of such memorandum of appeal.

4. The Appellate Authority is hereby directed to take Patna High Court CWJC No.10638 of 2024 dt.18-03-2025

note of Section 14 of the Limitation Act for the purpose of

condonation of delay to the extent that petitioner has spent time

in this Court. Petitioner is also permitted to submit

Interlocutory Application seeking interim relief, if any.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

P.S./-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          21.03.2025.
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter