Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajiv Kumar Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 866 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 866 Patna
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2025

Patna High Court

Rajiv Kumar Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 28 July, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11520 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Rajiv Kumar Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh S/o- Late Laxman Singh, R/o
     Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali. Presently residing at-
     Mahamadpur, P.S.- Begusarai Town, District- Begusarai. Working as X-Ray
     Technician, Community Health Centre, Pakaribarawan, District- Nawada.

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health
     Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, New
     Secretariat, Patna.
3.   The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Civil Surgeon, Nawada, District Nawada.
5.   The In-charge Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Pakaribarawan,
     District- Nawada and Referral Hospital Mokama, District- Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, AC to GA-9
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 28-07-2025

Heard the parties.

2. The challenge made in the present writ petition is

the order contained in Memo No. 1294(4) dated 28.11.2024 by

which even after revocation of suspension, the authorities has

denied to pay the salary for suspension period, i.e. with effect

from 18.03.2020 to 20.06.2024.

3. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned Advocate for

the petitioner submitted that it is surprising that with respect to

same memo of charge, the petitioner has been subjected to four Patna High Court CWJC No.11520 of 2025 dt.28-07-2025

departmental proceeding, one after another by putting him under

the prolonged suspension. Aggrieved with the order of

suspension, the petitioner had earlier moved before this Court in

CWJC No. 18359 of 2022 and the Court directed to conclude

the departmental proceeding, in question, by passing the final

order, either way, failing which the order of suspension of the

petitioner shall stand revoked automatically. In the light of the

order dated 27.02.2024, passed in the aforenoted case, finally

the suspension order of the petitioner stood revoked. But the

petitioner has been deprived from the salary of the suspension

period for over a period of four years.

4. It is the specific contention of the petitioner that the

respondent authorities are lingering over the departmental

proceeding(s), which have been commenced long back in the

year 2020 and further in the year 2023 and 2024. But none of

the departmental proceeding has brought to its logical

conclusion. The initiation of one after another departmental

proceeding on the same memo of charge is prima facie arbitrary

and an abuse of the power, at the hand of the disciplinary

authority, besides actuated with malice. Moreover, the petitioner

has always been ready to participate in the proceeding.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State Patna High Court CWJC No.11520 of 2025 dt.28-07-2025

submits that instruction is required as to whether the petitioner

has been subjected to departmental proceeding, based upon the

same charges or it differs from one another.

6. Considering the submissions set forth and in order

to give quietus to the litigation, this Court deems it feet and

proper to direct the respondent no. 2 to look into the matter and

ensure completion of all the departmental proceeding,

preferably within a period of six months, from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

7. It is made clear that the petitioner has also been

deprived from the salary for over a period of five years. In the

meanwhile, the respondent authorities shall also consider the

claim of the petitioner for extending the salary.

8. The writ petition stands disposed off with the

aforesaid observation and direction.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          30.07.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter