Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Priyawart Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 756 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 756 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2025

Patna High Court

Priyawart Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 24 July, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11082 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Priyawart Kumar S/o Prabhu Narayan Pandey, R/o Pandey Tola, Sonwal,
     VTC- Sonwal, P.O. and P.S. Sonwal, District- East Champaran, State- Bihar-
     845245.

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus


1.   The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land
     Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar.
2.   The Joint Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of
     Bihar.
3.   The District Collector, Araria, at P.O, District- Araria.
4.   The Additional District Magistrate, Araria at P.O, District- Araria.


                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                     Mr. Vaibhava Veer Shanker, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Rewti Kant Raman, AC to SC-11
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 24-07-2025

                    Heard Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, learned Senior

      Advocate with Mr. Vaibhava Veer Shanker, learned Advocate

      for the petitioner through virtual mode and Mr. Rewti Kant

      Raman, learned AC to SC-11.

                    2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated

      26.03.2025

issued under the signature of Joint Secretary,

Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar,

whereby and whereunder he has been placed under suspension. Patna High Court CWJC No.11082 of 2025 dt.24-07-2025

Further challenge is made to a Letter No. 673 dated 30.04.2025,

whereby the petitioner has been served with the memo of

charge.

3. Learned Senior Advocate referring to the averments

made in the writ petition has contended that on account of

anonymous complaint, regarding irregularity and thereby

amassing disproportionate property, the petitioner was subjected

to an internal enquiry by a Three Men Committee. The Three

Men Committee after conducting a detailed enquiry submitted a

report that the allegation levelled by anonymous person is found

to be incorrect based upon no evidence. Irrespective of the

aforesaid fact, the respondent authority proceeded further placed

the petitioner under suspension, without there being any legal

evidence and material. The respondent authority moved further

and issued a memo of charge directing the petitioner to submit

his explanation. The entire initiation of the departmental

proceeding based upon an anonymous letter is nothing but in

complete disregard to the Government Letter dated 24.06.2005,

the copy of which is marked as Annexure-P/12 issued under the

signature of the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar to all the

concerned that on the basis of anonymous, un-named and

mischievous complaint, no cognizance should be taken. Patna High Court CWJC No.11082 of 2025 dt.24-07-2025

4. Learned Senior Advocate further contended that the

entire enquiry and the disciplinary proceeding is actuated with

malice; as the same is initiated at the behest of the MLA;

moreover, the petitioner in response to the memo of charge has

submitted his proper explanation, but till date, no decision has

been taken at the level of the disciplinary authority. The

suspension of the petitioner by the Joint Secretary, Revenue and

Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar is also said to

be wholly without jurisdiction and does not warrant, in view of

the fact that the Three Men Committee has submitted a report

showing innocence of the petitioner.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State

submitted that since the petitioner has already filed his

explanation before the disciplinary authority, the same is

required to be considered and a final decision is to be taken by

him as to whether there is a requirement of initiation of the

departmental proceeding or not. He further submits that there is

a provision of appeal under Rule 23 of the Bihar Government

Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005

(hereinafter referred to as, "Rules, 2005"); against the order of

suspension also, the petitioner may avail such remedy.

6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the Patna High Court CWJC No.11082 of 2025 dt.24-07-2025

learned Advocate for the respective parties, this Court before

parting with the order, opined that the provisions underlying

Rules 17(4) and 17(5) of the Rules, 2005 clearly mandates the

disciplinary authority to ask show-cause on the charge memo

from the delinquent and also of hearing him, in person, before

the disciplinary authority takes the decision whether the matter

requires further enquiry in the manner prescribed or the

explanation is worthy for acceptance. It is for the disciplinary

authority to consider reply to charges and on consideration of

the cause shown in the reply to decide as to whether to close or

to continue with the proceeding by holding disciplinary enquiry

into the charges. Admittedly, the petitioner has already filed a

detailed explanation before the disciplinary authority, yet it has

not been considered by the disciplinary authority.

7. Considering the aforesaid fact, this Court direct the

Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms

Department, Government of Bihar to consider the explanation

of the petitioner to the imputation levelled in the charge memo

and take an appropriate decision based upon the materials

available on record, preferably within a period of six weeks,

from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

8. This Court further observe that the petitioner may Patna High Court CWJC No.11082 of 2025 dt.24-07-2025

also approach before the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue

and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar for

revocation of his suspension within a period of two weeks, by

filing an appropriate appeal, in terms with Rules 23 of the

Rules, 2005. In case such appeal is preferred, the same shall also

be considered, in accordance with law.

9. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the

writ petition stands disposed off.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          28.07.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter