Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashok Kumar Mishra vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1966 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1966 Patna
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Ashok Kumar Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 25 February, 2025

Author: Partha Sarthy
Bench: Partha Sarthy
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2021 of 2020
     ======================================================
1.    Ashok Kumar Mishra, son of Sri Ravindra Nath Mishra, resident of village
      and P.O.- Sundrapur, P.S. Keshariya, District- East Champaran at Motihari,
      presently working as an Assistant Teacher, Sanskrit Middle School,
      Ahiyapur, Anchal- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
2.   Manoj Kumar Mishra, son of Sri Ravindra Nath Mishra, resident of village
     and P.O. Sundrapur, P.S. Keshariya, District- East Champaran at Motihari,
     presently working as Headmaster, Sanskrit Middle School, Ahiyapur,
     Anchal- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.   Naveen Kumar, son of Sri Radhey Shyam Thakur, resident of village and
     P.O. Lakhanpur, P.S. Katra, District- Muzaffarpur, presently working as a
     Headmaster, Saraswati Sanskrit Middle School, Lakhanpur, Anchal- Katra,
     District- Muzaffarpur.
4.   Sweta Kumari, wife of Naveen Kumar and daughter of Ramchandra Prasad
     Singh, resident of village and P.O. Lakhanpur, P.S. Katra, District-
     Muzaffarpur, presently working as an Assistant Teacher, Saraswati Sanskrit
     Middle School, Lakhanpur, Anchal- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.
5.   Prem Sheela Devi, wife of Raj Kishore Sah, resident of village and P.O.
     Lakhanpur, P.S. Katra, District- Muzaffarpur, presently working as Peon,
     Saraswati Sanskrit Middle School, Lakhanpur, Anchal- Katra, District-
     Muzaffarpur.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The Joint Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Special Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
5.   The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
6.   The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, District-
     Muzaffarpur.
7.   The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, Patna through the
     Secretary.
8.   The Chairman, The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road,
     Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate
                                   Ms. Anita Kumari, Advocate
     For the State          :      Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, AC to AAG-15
     For the Board          :      Mr. Chandra Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate
     ======================================================
 Patna High Court CWJC No.2021 of 2020 dt.25-02-2025
                                           2/3




       CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
               and
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
       ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 25-02-2025

The issues raised in the present petition with

respect to the validity of Clause 5(h) of the resolution of

the Education Department, published in the Gazette, has

already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court

vide judgment dated 27.03.2019 passed in CWJC No.

985 of 2015.

2. The issue does not require any further

deliberation.

3. If the petitioners are in any way aggrieved by

the action of the respondents, it would be open for them

to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of their

grievances. However, this petition would not survive for

discussing the validity of the aforenoted clause in the

resolution of the Government.

4. The petition is disposed of with the liberty to

the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority for Patna High Court CWJC No.2021 of 2020 dt.25-02-2025

redressal of their grievance.

5. In case any representation is filed by the

petitioners before the concerned authority, needless to

say that it shall be disposed of within a reasonable period

of time, giving reasons.

(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)

(Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          25.02.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter