Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vibha Kumari vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2538 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2538 Patna
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Vibha Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 19 August, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22173 of 2018
     ======================================================
     Vibha Kumari Wife of Chandra Vijay Kumar, Resident of Village- Harpur,
     Police Station- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar
2.   The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Level Selection Committee,
     Muzaffarpur.
3.   The District Supply Officer-cum-Secretary, District Level Selection
     Committee, Muzaffarpur.
4.   The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Licensing Authority, West, Muzaffarpur.
5.   The Block Supply Officer, Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.
6.   Priyanka Kumari Wife of Chandra Prakash, Resident of Village- Mroha,
     Post Office and Police Station- Kathaiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :          Mr.Mani Bhushan Kumar
     For the Respondent/s   :          Mr.S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                  ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 19-08-2025

1. The writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"(i) For directing and commanding the respondents to select the petitioner as a Dealer of Fair Price Shop under Public Distribution System for Village and Panchayat Harpur in place of private respondent No. 6 Priyanka Patna High Court CWJC No.22173 of 2018 dt.19-08-2025

Kumari as petitioner is most suitable candidate for that.

(ii) For directing and commanding the respondents to cancel the licence of Private respondent No. 6 as it is obtained by illegal way.

(iii) And also for any other relief/reliefs for which petitioner is found to be legally entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and

Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides

for the provision of revision.

Section 32(iii) 32(v) and 32(vi) read as

follows:

32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to Patna High Court CWJC No.22173 of 2018 dt.19-08-2025

the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days.

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has Patna High Court CWJC No.22173 of 2018 dt.19-08-2025

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection

Committee he cannot review his orders in an appeal.

Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the same

has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the Patna High Court CWJC No.22173 of 2018 dt.19-08-2025

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the

complaint/application shall be condoned by the

authority concerned, and the authority shall dispose

of the same within three months from the date of

filing of the same.

7. With the above said observations, the Writ

petition shall stand disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

vinita/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          21.08.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter