Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2515 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2515 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Rajesh Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12858 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Rajesh Kumar Sinha S/o Late Krishna Murari Prasad, R/o Mohalla- Gyan
     Vibhakar Parmeshwar Lane Rani Ghat, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna, Bihar.
     (Retired Peon Primary Teacher Training College, Mahendru (Raniganj), P.S.
     Sultanganj, Patna)

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Department of Education,
     Government of Bihar, P.S. Secretariate, District- Patna.
2.   The Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, P.S.
     Secretariate, District- Patna
3.   The Director, State Council of Education and Training Mahendru, Patna, P.S.
     Sultanganj, District-Patna.
4.   The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, P.S. Sultanganj,
     District-Patna.
5.   The Principal, Primary Teacher Training College, Mahendru (Raniganj), P.S.
     Sultanganj, District- Patna
6.   The District Accounts Officer, Patna, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna.
7.   The Accountant-General, Bihar, Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Anand Raj, Advocate
     For the State          :      Mr. Md. Irshad, Advocate
     For the A.G., Bihar    :      Mr. Ram Kinker Choubey, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT

     Date : 18-08-2025

                       Heard the parties.

                       2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking

      issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the

      respondent authorities to extend the benefits of first and second

      ACP/MACP to the petitioner in accordance with the relevant

      rules and schemes governing the assure career progression.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.12858 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025
                                           2/3




                        3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted

         that it is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed on the

         post of peon on 19.07.2000 in Primary Teacher Training

         College, Mahendru, Patna, and after rendering services for more

         than 22 years, finally the petitioner superannuated on

         31.10.2023

. However, notwithstanding the aforesaid fact, the

petitioner has been deprived from the benefit of ACP/MACP

and his pension has been fixed on a lesser amount. It is further

contended that since the issue with regard to the benefit for

ACP/MACP has already been crystallized under the ACP Rules,

2003 and further in MACP Rules, 2010 as also in view of the

ruling of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amresh Kumar

Singh and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Ors. reported in 2023

SCC OnLine SC 496 and further by the Full Bench of this Court

in the case of Kamlanand Thakur vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

and analogous cases reported in 2025 (2) PLJR 623, there could

not be any impediment in extending the benefit of ACP/MACP

to the petitioner.

4. Learned Advocate for the State interjected at this

juncture and submitted that apart from the fact the petitioner

approached this Court after his superannuation, instruction is

required to respond to the averments made in the writ petition.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12858 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025

5. Having considered the submissions advanced by

the learned Advocates for the respective parties and the nature

of the grievance, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose off

the writ petition with a direction to the respondent Nos. 4 and 5

to look into the matter and consider the claim of the petitioner

for grant of ACP/MACP and take a final decision, preferably

within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

6. Suffice it to observe that in case the claim of the

petitioner finds favour, necessary consequential order extending

the benefit of ACP/MACP be issued in his favour within the

said period.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

disposed off with the aforesaid direction.

(Harish Kumar, J) sauravkrsinha/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          19.08.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter