Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajeev Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 3537 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3537 Patna
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2025

Patna High Court

Rajeev Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 29 April, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Pandey
Bench: Alok Kumar Pandey
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6583 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Rajeev Kumar Son of Late Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh, Resident of
     Village- Rajauli, P.O. and P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar Bihar
2.   The District Magistrate, Rajauli, Nawada.
3.   The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rajauli, Nawada.
4.   The Anchal Adhikari, Rajauli, Nawada.
5.   Smt. Indira Singh, wife of Late Prem Kumar Singh @ Biraj Babu, R/o
     Village, P.O. and P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada.
6.   Sumit Kumar Saurav, son of Late Prem Kumar Singh @ Biraj Babu, R/o
     Village, P.O. and P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada.
7.   Nishant Kumar Singh, son of Late Prem Kumar Singh @ Biraj Babu, R/o
     Village, P.O. and P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Dhananjay Kumar
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Government Pleader (17)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     Date : 29-04-2025
               In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the
      following relief:-
                            1. That this is an application for issuance
                            of an appropriate writ order/orders for
                            setting aside the part order dated
                            19.2.2025

as contained in annexure-P/6 passed in Mutation Appeal No. 266/2023- 2024 by Respondent no.3 D.C.L.R. Rajauli whereby he was pleased to set aside the order dated 26.2.2022 passed in Mutation Case No.1365 R27/2021-2022- by Respondent no.4 Anchal Adhikari, Rajauli as contained in Annexure-2 and directed the Respondent no.4 to pass fresh order accordingly to law and/or pass such any other order/orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6583 of 2025 dt.29-04-2025

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

is the owner of land appertaining to Mauza Rajauli Thana No.

184 bearing Khata No. 370 Plot No. 3486, 3499, 3498 and 331

measuring area 0.26 decimal, 0.24 decimal, 0.54 decimal and

0.02 decimal. He further submits that respondent no. 5 filed

application for mutation of land before Circle Officer, Rajauli,

Nawada. The Circle Officer has dismissed the mutation petition

by order dated 26.02.2022. Against the said order, respondent

no.5 to 7 moved before the D.C.L.R, Rajauli in Mutation

Appeal No. 266 of 2023-2024 and by order dated 19.02.2025,

D.C.L.R has allowed the appeal with direction to the Circle

Officer, Rajauli to pass appropriate order as per law with regard

to the land of the petitioner, however, it was ordered that this

order shall be subject to the final outcome of the title suit

pending in the civil court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

is aggrieved by the part of the D.C.L.R's order wherein it has

been recorded that Circle Officer is directed to pass appropriate

order with regard to the land in question. Being aggrieved by the

said one line finding of the appellate authority, the petitioner has

approached this court. Learned counsel submits that where land

dispute is pending before Civil Court such finding cannot be Patna High Court CWJC No.6583 of 2025 dt.29-04-2025

allowed to be recorded by the concerned authority.

4. Learned counsel on behalf of the State submits that it is a

matter of record, however, if petitioner approaches the higher

authority against the order of D.C.L.R, same may be rectified.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the

arguments advanced on behalf of the parties, the writ petition

stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the

competent authority against the finding of the D.C.L.R by way

of filing representation within four weeks from the date of

receipt of the order. If such representation is filed within the

stipulated period, the competent authority shall consider and

pass appropriate order expeditiously after giving opportunity of

hearing to the parties concerned.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          01.05.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter