Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2986 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1160 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6968 of 2024
======================================================
Bholi Devi, Wife of Suresh Choudhary, Resident of Simri Bakhtiyarpur,
Kanutola, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa, Bihar.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its
Managing Director, Patna Bihar.
2. The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited,
Vidhut Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.
3. The Assistant Electricity Engineer, Electricity Supply Sub Division, Simari
Bakhtiyarpur/Sonvarsha Raj, District- Saharsa.
4. The Junior Electricity Engineer, Electricity Supply Sub-Branch, Simari
Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Advocate
For the BSPHCL : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Addl. S.C.
Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Advocate
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 02-04-2025
The learned counsel for the appellant presses I.A.
No. 01 of 2025 seeking condonation of delay of 13 days in
preferring this appeal.
2. For the reasons stated in the Interlocutory
Application, the delay of 13 days in preferring this appeal is Patna High Court L.P.A No.1160 of 2024 dt.02-04-2025
condoned.
3. The Interlocutory Application No. 01 of 2025
stands allowed.
4. By the impugned order dated 30.09.2024 passed
in CWJC No. 6968 of 2024, a learned Single Judge of this
Court, on finding that the appellant had an alternative and
effective remedy of preferring an application under Section
42 (5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 before the Consumer
Grievance Redressal Forum (for short 'C.G.R.F.'), relegated
her to prefer such complaint before the authority referred to
above.
5. There is no reason for us to interfere with the
aforenoted judgment.
6. It would be open for the appellant to approach
the C.G.R.F. within a period of six weeks, to be counted
from today, which shall be entertained by the C.G.R.F. and
necessary orders in accordance with law shall be passed.
7. It would be open for the appellant to challenge
the aforesaid order before the appropriate forum, should she
deem it necessary to do so.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1160 of 2024 dt.02-04-2025
8. The interim arrangement in the impugned
judgment shall continue till the time the complaint is
decided by the C.G.R.F.
9. The appeal stands disposed of with the
aforenoted observations/directions.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)
(Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 03.04.2025 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!