Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinay Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 1564 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1564 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024

Patna High Court

Vinay Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 1 March, 2024

Author: Anjani Kumar Sharan

Bench: Anjani Kumar Sharan

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.95 of 2024
     ======================================================
1.    Vinay Kumar Jha Son of Late Ramdeo Jha, resident of Village-Siswar,
      Police Station-Phulparas, District-Madhubani.
2.   Lal Dai, wife of Late Prabodh Pathak, resident of Village-Mansapur, Police
     Station-Phulparas, District-Madhubani.
3.   Amar Lata Devi, Wife of Late Kusheshwar Yadav, resident of Village-
     Mansapur, Police Station-Phulparas, District-Madhubani.
4.   Chandra Shekhar Jha, Son of Late Nirmal Kant Jha, resident of Village-
     Ghoghardiha, Police Station-Ghoghardiha, District-Madhubani.
5.   Narayan Jha, Son of Late Baleshwar Jha, resident of Village-Ghoghardiha,
     Police Station-Ghoghardiha, District-Madhubani.
6.   Ashok Kumar Jha, son of Late Sristi Narayan Jha, resident of Village-
     Brahmapur, Police Station-Phulparas, District-Madhubani.

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
     Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
4.   The Special Director, Secondary Education (In charge Sanskrit), Department
     of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.   The District Education Officer, Madhubani.
6.   The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Madhubani.
7.   The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.
8.   The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Hemant Kumar Jha
     For the State          :     Mr.Sita Ram Yadav, G.P.16
                                  Mr.Yatindra Narayan, A.C. to G.P.16
     For the BSSB           :     Mr.S.S. Sundaram, Adv.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 01-03-2024

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel Patna High Court CWJC No.95 of 2024 dt.01-03-2024

for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha

Board.

2. The present writ application has been filed by the

petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus

and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing

and commanding the respondents to make payment of arrear by

way of differential amount of salary in the revised pay scale

under 5th, 6th and 7th pay revision in the same manner as allowed

to the teaching and non-teaching staffs of the Government

Schools together with Dearness Allowance admissible thereon

as has been directed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble

Court in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 and analogous cases vide order

dated 13.08.2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners' case is fully covered by the judgment passed by this

Court in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 and analogous cases.

4. Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the

petitioners stand on similar footing to that of the petitioners of

L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, there is no requirement to keep pending

the present writ application in want of counter-affidavit.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to file a detailed

representation along with a copy of the order passed in the Patna High Court CWJC No.95 of 2024 dt.01-03-2024

L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, before the respondent no.5 within a

period of four weeks.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent no.5 is directed to

dispose off the representation of the petitioners by passing a

reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, within a

period of six weeks from the date of filing of such

representation by the petitioners and respondent no.5 is directed

to personally hear the petitioners or their counsel and pay the

claim/admitted dues of the petitioners.

7. The respondent no.5 is directed to ensure compliance of

this order and if the representation of the petitioners is not

considered within the stipulated period, the respondent no.5

shall be personally held responsible for non-complying the order

of this Court.

8. With the aforesaid directions, this writ application is

hereby disposed off.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

pallavi/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N.A.
Uploading Date          05.03.2024
Transmission Date       N.A.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter