Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4192 Patna
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9590 of 2024
======================================================
Manir Alam Son of Hanif Ansari, Resident of Village - Bhorha, Ward No.6,
P.S. Belsand, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Rural Development Department,
Bihar, Patna.
2. The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Commissioner, Manrega, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi.
6. The Programme Officer, Block-Belsand, District- Sitamarhi.
7. The Block Development Officer, Block-Belsand, District- Sitamarhi.
8. The Panchayat Rojgar Sevak, Gram Panchayat Rukanpur, Patahi, Block-
Belsand, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.P.K. Shahi Advocate General
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 28-06-2024
The first question raised by the petitioner is as to
whether the petitioner has got locus to agitate the issue herein
by way of a Public Interest Litigation. From the averments, we
are of the opinion that no such locus standi is conferred on the
petitioner, especially since it is a private cause that is sought to
be agitated. The petitioner's contention is that the petitioners
and other co-villagers constructed cattle sheds as per the welfare Patna High Court CWJC No.9590 of 2024 dt.28-06-2024
scheme implemented by the Rural Development Department. It
is stated that they were asked to construct the cattle sheds using
own money and further to submit the vouchers for
reimbursement of the amounts expended. It is contented that
then no reimbursement was ordered, the Lokpal (Manrega),
District, Sitamarhi was approached and it had passed an order
dated 19.06.2023. There is nothing stated as to the constitution
of the Lokpal or the efficacy of the recommendations made by
it. The allegation is also that the Lokpal has found the 6 th
respondent to be responsible for the misuse of the amounts due,
who also has not been impleaded in the personal capacity.
2. In the totality of the circumstances as noticed
above, we find absolutely no reason to entertain the writ petition
and we dismiss the same.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Harish Kumar, J) Anushka/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 01.07.2024 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!