Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Sis Limited vs State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 580 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 580 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2024

Patna High Court

M/S Sis Limited vs State Of Bihar on 23 January, 2024

Bench: Chief Justice, Rajiv Roy

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.891 of 2024
     ======================================================
     M/s SIS Limited a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956,
     having its registered office at Annapoorna Bhawan, Patliputra Telephone
     Exchange Road, Kurji, Patna, Bihar - 800010, through its Authorized
     Representative/Signatory, Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh, Associate Vice
     President, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shiv Kumar Singh, R/o H.No. A- 4,
     Vigyan Vihar Colony, Near Air Strip P.S. Barwadda, Dhanbad, Jharkhand-
     826004.

                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                  Versus
1.   State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department,
     Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), through its Director,
     having its office Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014, Bihar.
3.   Bihar State Electronics Development Corporation Limited (BELTRON)
     through its Managing Director, having its registered office at Beltron
     Bhawan P.S. Shashtri Nagar, Patna, Bihar, India, 800023.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Senior Advocate
                                  Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate
                                  Mr. Anupam Kishore Sinha, Advocate

     For the Respondent No.1:     Mrs. Binita Singh, Standing Counsel- 28

     For the Respondent No.2:     Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate

     For the Respondent No.3:     Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate

     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

      Date : 23-01-2024

                    The petitioner is concerned with the Notice Inviting

      Tenders having E-Tender Notice No.02/Watch & Ward

      Services/2023-24/MS Cell and E-Tender Notice No.03/Watch &

      Ward Services/2023-24/MS Cell for which the last date of
 Patna High Court CWJC No.891 of 2024 dt.23-01-2024
                                           2/3




         uploading the bids was 30.10.2023.

                     2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner

         based on Annexure-P/7 submits that it has been admitted that on

         30.10.2023

between 3:36 PM to 5.:35 PM, due to technical

reasons, the portal was down and there could not have been any

uploading of tenders.

3. We have to notice that the tender documents were

to be submitted during a period which started from 12.10.2023

and up to 30.10.2023. There is no reason why the petitioner

tried to upload his tender at the last moment. Yet again, we see

that the writ petition has been filed on 16.01.2024 after about

four months. When we enquired with the learned Government

Pleader as to the stage at which the tender is, it has been

submitted that the tender is at the stage of opening of financial

bid.

4. We see absolutely no reason to interfere with the

tender proceedings.

5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that a representation had been filed before the authority,

but that does not absolve the petitioner from approaching this

Court immediately since it is a tender process which cannot be

stalled on the unsuccessful uploading on such specious reasons.

Patna High Court CWJC No.891 of 2024 dt.23-01-2024

The whimsical arguments raised with delay, cannot be allowed

for invocation of the extraordinary, discretionary remedy. This is

a fit case to deny exercise of discretion.

6. The writ petition is dismissed in limine.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

(Rajiv Roy, J) Sunil/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          23.01.2024
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter