Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sahdeo Mandal vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 422 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 422 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Sahdeo Mandal vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 16 January, 2024

Author: Partha Sarthy

Bench: Partha Sarthy

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12585 of 2015
     ======================================================
     Sahdeo Mandal, Son of Late Mangal Mahto, resident of village- Arma, P.S.
     Kajra (Surajgarha), District- Lakhisarai

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar
2.   The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of
     Bihar, Patna
3.   The Commissioner and Secretary,                Human   Resources   Department,
     Government of Bihar, Patna
4.   The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
5.   The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai
6.   The Deputy Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai
7.   The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Lakhisarai
8.   The District Education Superintendent, Lakhisarai
9.   The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai
10. The Block Development Officer, Lakhisarai
11. The Block Education Officer, Lakhisarai
12. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Arma, P.S.- Kajra, District-
    Lakhisarai
13. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Arma, P.s.- Kajra (Surajgarha), District-
    Lakhisarai

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Manmohan Prasad Singh, Advocate
                                     Mr. Narsingh Tanti, Advocate
     For the State            :      Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, AC to AAG-6
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                           ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 16-01-2024

                     1.     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

      learned counsel for the respondents.

                     2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for

      the following relief(s):-
 Patna High Court CWJC No.12585 of 2015 dt.16-01-2024
                                            2/6




                                     "1. That this an application for issuance of
                         writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions by
                         quashing     the    office    order   contained   in   letter
                         no.12/पशशo ववद 65/06-303 (Annexure-4) dt-2.9.08
                         issued by the Chief Secretary, Human Resources
                         Department, Govt. of Bihar, (Resp. No.2) to the extent
                         whereby and where under they have cancelled earlier
                         office order contained in letter No.57/Pat. Dated
                         16.3.2007

(Annexure-5) issued by the Commissioner and Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, (Resp. No.3), regarding the recognition of Bhagwan Budh Teachers Training College, Nirmali, Supaul under which the petitioner has passed his examination in Ist Division conducted by the same under the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court for the students of Session 1989-91 upon which he claimed for appointment/selection on the post of Trained Primary Teachers, under Gram Panchayat Teachers Employment, 2008, within the Panchayat Arma, Block and District- Lakhisarai, after setting aside the order dated 4.7.2011 passed in Appeal No.121 of 2010- 11( Annexure-2) by the District Teachers Employment Tribunal, Lakhisarai. (Resp. No.7)"

3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the

respondents having invited applications for appointment as

trained Panchayat Teachers under the second phase, the

petitioner fulfilling all the requirements filed an application for

the same and on being called appeared for counselling on

30.12.2010. The candidature of the petitioner having illegally Patna High Court CWJC No.12585 of 2015 dt.16-01-2024

been rejected in the counselling, the petitioner filed an appeal

(Appeal no.121 of 2010-11) before the District Teachers

Employment Appellate Tribunal, Lakhisarai which was

dismissed vide order dated 4.7.2011. The dismissal was on the

ground that the applicant had not submitted his final training

certificate before the Panchayat Secretary. The petitioner moved

this Court by filing CWJC no. 10741 of 2013 against the order

of the Appellate Tribunal. The writ application of the petitioner

was dismissed vide order dated 1.12.2014 (Annexure-3) in the

following terms:-

"Heard learned counsel for the parties. So long as Annexure-A, dated 02.09.2008 stands, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in the present writ application, because the very foundation as contained in Annexure-3 has been knocked out by the said decision.

Petitioner may assail the order, contained in Annexure-A, if he so wants.

Writ application is otherwise dismissed."

4. By order dated 2.9.2008, which finds mention in

the order dated 1.12.2014 quoted herein above, it was observed

that so far as the recognition is concerned, after coming of the

NCTE Act, 1993, in view of the provisions mentioned therein,

the grant of recognition was no longer in the domain of the State

Government. It is this order dated 2.9.2008 which along with Patna High Court CWJC No.12585 of 2015 dt.16-01-2024

other orders which have been challenged by the petitioner in the

instant writ application. Besides challenge to the order dated

2.9.2008, the petitioner has also challenged the other orders

including the order dated 4.7.2011 passed in Appeal no.121 of

2010-11 (Annexure-2) by the District Teachers Employment

Tribunal, Lakhisarai rejecting the appeal preferred by the

petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his

contention refers to and relies on the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court dated 23.11.2010 in the case of Bhagwan Budha

Prathmik Technical Training College Nirmali vs. the State of

Bihar & Others and analogous case brought on record as

Annexure-A to the counter affidavit of respondent no.4.

6. In response, learned counsel for the respondents

relying on the statement made in the writ application together

with the counter affidavit of respondent- Director, Primary

Education submits that reading of the judgment dated

23.11.2010 in the case of Bhagwan Budha Prathmik Technical

Training College Nirmali (supra) brought on record by the

respondents in their counter affidavit as also other judgments of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is settled that after coming of the

NCTE Act, 1993, so far as recognition of the institution is Patna High Court CWJC No.12585 of 2015 dt.16-01-2024

concerned, it is within the sole domain of the National Council

for Teacher Education and not of the State Government. The

institution of the petitioner not having the required recognition

of the NCTE, the petitioner was not qualified nor eligible for

making an application for appointment as Panchayat Teacher

and the respondent authorities including the tribunal has rightly

rejected the application of the petitioner. There is no merit in the

instant application and the same be dismissed.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the material on record, the facts

relevant for the instant application are that the petitioner having

obtained his two years degree course in teachers training from

Bhagwan Budha Prathmik Shikshak Shiksha Mahavidyalaya in

the year 2009, applied for appointment as a Panchayat Teacher,

as stated above. It is not in dispute that the appointments were

to take place in accordance with the Bihar Panchayat Primary

Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) (Amendment)

Rules, 2008. Rule 8 of the Rules provide that for making an

application for appointment, the candidate should have obtained

his two years Teachers Training Diploma or Certificate from an

institution recognized by the National Council for Teacher

Education.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12585 of 2015 dt.16-01-2024

8. So far as the case of the petitioner is concerned,

even though the claim of the petitioner is that he got his degree

on 13.11.2009 ie prior to the date of counselling and did

produce the same contrary to the findings of the authorities in

the orders impugned, it is not in dispute that the institution in

question from which the petitioner obtained his degree in the

year 2009, at no point of time was it recognized by the National

Council for Teacher Education as required under the NCTE Act.

In the opinion of the Court, the petitioner lacking the basic

degree of having a requisite qualification from an institution

duly recognized by the Regional Committee under the NCTE

Act, 1993, was ineligible to apply for the post of Panchayat

Teacher.

9. The Court thus finds no merit in the instant

application and the same is dismissed.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          19.01.2024
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter