Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 392 Patna
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12488 of 2012
======================================================
1. Kumari Punam Devi Wife Of Hari Narayan Mahto Resident Of Village -
Bhatuadih, P.S. - Bathnaha, District - Sitamarhi
2. Geeta Kumari Wife Of Guddu Kumar Ravi Resident Of Village - Chanpura ,
P.S. - Bathnaha, District - Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Dept. Of Welfare Bihar, Patna
3. The Director, Dept. Of Welfare Bihar, Patna
4. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur
5. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi
6. The District Programme Officer, Sitamarhi
7. The Child Development Project Officer, Bathnaha, Sitamarhi
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Alok, SC 7
Mr. Satyeshwar Prasad, AC to SC 7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 15-01-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for directing
the respondents authorities to consider for their appointment to
post of Anganbari Sevika in ward No. 14 in Kamaldah
Panchayat Dagrahi Tola and Bishunpur Chandpura at Centre
No. 69.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CWJC No.12488 of 2012 dt.15-01-2024
pursuant to the advertisement the petitioners have applied for
the same and the petitioner no. 1 was selected for appointment
in ward no. 14 and petitioner no. 2 was selected for appointment
in ward no. 69. After selection of the petitioners, the respondent
no. 7 sent the certificates of the petitioners for verification to the
concerned Board where from the petitioners had obtained the
degree of Higher Secondary. He further submits that the
petitioners have submitted the certificates of Higher Secondary
from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi and the
petitioners have submitted the same along with their application
for the post in question.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that during
verification it was found that the educational certificate/degree
was issued by the Board of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi
and the State Government has taken a decision that the
certificate/degree issued from the Board of Higher Secondary
Education, Delhi is not valid/genuine degree and the same is not
a recognized institute and any degree issued by the said institute
is not valid for the appointment on the post in question in the
State of Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12488 of 2012 dt.15-01-2024
5. In view of the aforesaid, the authorities has rightly
rejected the claim of the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.01.2024 Transmission Date N/A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!