Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satish Kumar Das And Anr vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 4314 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4314 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2023

Patna High Court
Satish Kumar Das And Anr vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 5 September, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1991 of 2018
     ======================================================

1. Satish Kumar Das Son of Late Basudeo Lal Das.

2. Harish Kumar Das Son of late Basudeo Lal Das.

Both Residents of Village- Ganaun, Police Station- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Animal and Fishery.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Fishery, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4. The District Fishery Officer, Darbhanga.

5. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Darbhanga.

6. The Additional Collector, Darbhanga.

7. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Benipur.

8. The Circle Officer, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha- Sc19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-09-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking

direction to the respondent no.8 to demarcate the boundary of their

pond appertaining to Khata No.126, Khesra No.4997 which is

situated in Mauza Shahpur Ganaun measuring an area of 99 ½

Decimals out of 1 Acre 99 Decimals.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

petitioners have purchased the land of Khata No.126, Plot Patna High Court CWJC No.1991 of 2018 dt.05-09-2023

No.4997 in the year 1944 particularly on 16.05.1944 from one

Hanif S/o Wasil. He further submits that dispute has earlier been

raised by the Government in the year 1973-74 and Deputy

Collector Land Reforms in Sairat Case No.277/73-74 has decided

that the said purchased land by the petitioners is private Pokhar

which is annexed as Annexure-2 in the writ petition. He also

submits that petitioners are continuing in the possession of the said

pond but they need demarcation of their area, therefore, they filed

an application before Circle Officer, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga

for demarcation of their land.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the

counter affidavit has been filed and in the said counter affidavit the

stand has been taken by the State that the claim of petitioners is by

virtue of sale deed dated 16.05.1944, in the said sale deed the Plot

No.3997 is mentioned but actually the plot on which the Pokhar is

situated is Plot No.4997 and according to State till the said plot

shall not be corrected in the said sale deed, the lands cannot be

treated of the petitioners. He further submits that in the Revisional

Survey new Khata No.1526 and New Plot No.1041 is recorded in

the name of "Anabad Bihar Sarkar" and nature of land has been

shown as "pond". In this view of the matter, there is no entitlement

of petitioner as prayed.

5. In this view of the matter that on one hand, there is Patna High Court CWJC No.1991 of 2018 dt.05-09-2023

wrong entry of plot number made in the sale deed on 16.05.1944

but on the other hand for the same land the order dated 30.06.1982

was passed in Sairat Case No.2 of 1978-79 in favour of petitioners

which has never been challenged by the State and it acquires

finality.

6. In this background, the petitioners are directed to

get a decree from competent Civil Court with regard to

identification of the land in question that whether the land which

they have purchased is the same land or it is different land at all

and till decision of the title suit, there shall be no disturbance from

the State side as the order passed by the Additional Collector has

acquired finality.

7. It is made clear that till the title suit which shall be

filed by the petitioners relating to the registered sale deed, the

State shall make no interference in any manner whatsoever it may

be.

8. With this direction and observation, the present

Writ Petition stand disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Ritik/-

AFR/NAFR                        NAFR
CAV DATE                         NA
Uploading Date               11/09/2023
Transmission Date                NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter