Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2061 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8155 of 2016
======================================================
M/s Shambhu Saran Singh, partnership firm having its registered office at Amthakhem, P.O. Line Bazar, District- Gopalganj, Bihar through one of its Partner namely Sri Sanjay Singh, son of Late Daya Shankar Singh, resident of Gopla Math, P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Tourism Department, Government of Bihar.
2. The Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Bihar Undertaking, Veerchand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar through Executive Engineer.
3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., Patna.
4. The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., Patna
5. The Superintendent of Engineer, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., Siwan.
6. The Executive Engineer-in-Cum-Engineer-in-Charge, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashish Giri, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to GP-4 For Respondent Nos. 2 to 6: Mr. Kumar Abhimanyu Pratap, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 02-05-2023
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for
following reliefs:-
"i) For issuance of a writ/ order/ direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.12.2015 of the State Government issued by the respondent Executive Engineer, Bihar State Tourism Patna High Court CWJC No.8155 of 2016 dt.02-05-2023
Development Corporation Ltd. Patna on behalf of the State Government by which the agreement bearing no. 02/SBD/2013 dated 18.2.2013 entered with the petitioner in relation to development of tourism infrastructure at Baba Mahendranath Temple, Siwan, Phase-II has been cancelled, the security deposit seized and the petitioner blacklisted (Annexure-21)
ii) For issuance of a writ/ order/ direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to refund the security deposit of the petitioner which has been illegally forfeited wholly without jurisdiction.
iii) For issuance of such other writ(s), order(s), direction(s) as your Lordships may deem fit and proper."
3. In not executing certain works assigned to
petitioner within the time limit stipulated, he has been blacklisted
on 12.12.2015. Communication dated 12.12.2015 (Annexure-21)
reads as under:-
"fcgkj LVsV VwfjTe MsoyieasV dkWjiksjs"ku fy0 Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
ohjpan iVsy iFk/ Beerchand Patel Path, iVuk / Patna - 800001 nwjk"k / Phone:- +91-612-2225411, 2506219, 2222622 QSDl u0 / Fax No.:- +91-612-2506218 Web:www.bstdc.gov.in E-mail: [email protected]/adm[email protected]
से वा मे , es0 "kaw "kj.k flag xako - veFkk [kse i®0 -ykÃu cktkj, ehjxat ftyk - xksikyxat ववषय: floku ftykUrxZr ckck egsUnzukFk esgj esa i;ZVdh; lqfo/kkvksa ds fodkl dk;Z ds ,djkjukek dks jnn~ djus ,oa dkyh lwph esa uke vafdr djus ds laca/k esa egk'k;, fuxe ds i=kad - 557, fnukad - 01.10.15 dks vkils Li"Vhdj.k dh ekax dh xbZ Fkh tks oÙkZeku le; rd vkids }kjk ugha Patna High Court CWJC No.8155 of 2016 dt.02-05-2023
fn;k x;k A vkids }kjk fd, x, ,djkjukek la[;k 02/SBD/2013 dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh vkids }kjk tek tekur dh jkf'k dks tCr djrs gq, dkyh lwph esa uke ntZ dh tkrh gSA fo'oklHkktu g/0 dk;Zikyd vfHk;ark fc0jk0i0fo0fu0fy0, iVuk"
4. Perusal of the same it is evident that petitioner
has not been heard before blacklisting. The other side have not
disputed the factual aspects of the matter. Accordingly, the
petitioner has made out a case. Hence, Annexure-21 dated
12.12.2015, blacklisting order, stands set aside reserving liberty
to the petitioner insofar as withholding of security deposit is
concerned he is at liberty to invoke remedy under Clause 25 of
the SBD. With the above observations the present petition
stands disposed of. Any other dues are required to be settled by
the respondent. In this regard, petitioner is hereby directed to
furnish a detailed representation before the concerned authority.
If such representation is submitted, the concerned authority
shall examine and resolve the issue.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Arun Kumar Jha, J)
rakhi/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date 05.05.2023 Transmission Date N.A.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!