Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Indian Oil Company Limited vs M/S Lakshmi Mahto Ram Chandra ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1152 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1152 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023

Patna High Court
Indian Oil Company Limited vs M/S Lakshmi Mahto Ram Chandra ... on 23 March, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Letters Patent Appeal No.1222 of 2017
                                          In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3198 of 2013
     ======================================================

1. Indian Oil Company Limited having its registered office at Mumbai through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.

2. The General Manager, Indian Oil Company Limited, Bihar State Office, Marketing Division, Eastern Region, Loknayak Bhawan, Dak Bunglow road, P.S-Kotwali, Dist-Patna.

3. The Divisional Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Assistant Manager (Retail Sales), Indian Oil Corporation, Darbhanga.

... ... Appellant/s Versus

1. M/s Lakshmi Mahto Ram Chandra Prasad, Anr S/o Late Mahaveer Mahto, R/o Nariyal Bazar, Near Canara Bank, P.S.- Madhubani, Town and District- Madhubani.

2. Shiv Kumar Mahto, S/o Late Lakshmi Mahto, R/o Nariyal Bazar, Near Canara Bank, P.S.- Madhubani, Town and District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kali Das Chatterji, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amlesh Kumar Varma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rohit Raj, Advocate Mrs. Archana Shahi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 23-03-2023

The present L.P.A. is against the order of the learned

Single Judge dated 19.05.2017 passed in CWJC No 3198 of

2013.

2. In the writ petition, respondent had prayed for the

following reliefs:-

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1222 of 2017 dt.23-03-2023

"(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of Letter dated 29.11.2012 bearing reference No.- BSO/LMRP issued by Respondent No.-2 where by the Representation filed by the petitioner for revival of the SKO/LDO agencies has been disallowed.

(ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus direction to the Respondents to complete all concerned formalities with respect to the reconstitution of the firm in accordance with guidelines.

(iii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus direction to the respondents to restore the supply of products to all the five agencies consisting of four units of Kerosene oil dealership and one retail outlet of petrol pump which is lying suspended since 12.09.2007.

(iv) For any other reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Writ petition was allowed, as a result, the Indian Oil

Corporation Limited (IOCL) has presented this LPA.

4. During the intervening period of pendency of the

litigation respondents are not interested in pursuing the relief

sought by them in the writ petition. On the other hand, they have

certain grievance with the Appellant-Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. In this regard the respondents were stated to have Patna High Court L.P.A No.1222 of 2017 dt.23-03-2023

submitted representation on 07.03.2019 to the Divisional

Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division,

Muzaffarpur and the subject is relating to refund of unsupplied

quantity of kerosene oil against cost deposited. In this regard,

the respondents were permitted to file additional representation,

if any, within a period one month from the date of receipt of this

order. Thereafter, the Divisional Manager, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Muzaffarpur is

hereby directed to redress the grievance of the petitioner while

passing a detailed speaking order within a period of three

months from the date of receipt of the additional representation,

if any.

5. With the above observations, the present L.P.A. stands

disposed of and it is made clear that order of the learned Single

Judge is not binding on the respective parties.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Arun Kumar Jha, J) Daya/ Himanshu/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          28.03.2023
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter