Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kedar Prasad Gupta @ Kedar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 361 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 361 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2023

Patna High Court
Kedar Prasad Gupta @ Kedar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 24 January, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18311 of 2019
     ======================================================

Kedar Prasad Gupta @ Kedar Prasad S/o Late Bhola Saw Resident of Village Chakiya P.O. Pahleja,P.S. Dehri (M), Dist.Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Affairs, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate cum Chairman, District Selection Committee, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. The Sub Divisional Oficer cum Licensing Authority, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer cum Licensing Authority, Rohtas at Dehri

5. The Block Development Officer,Dehri, District Rohtas.

6. The Circle Officer,Dehri, District-Rohtas

7. The Block Supply Officer,Dehri Rural, District Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (AAG 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

Date : 24-01-2023 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

Mr. Tiwari has submitted that for no fault of his, the license which was granted to him in the year 1990 could not be renewed as the concerned authorities, who had to take a call with respect to renewing his license under the new Control Order, did not pay heed to his request.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18311 of 2019 dt.24-01-2023

We express our sympathies with the petitioner if this allegation is correct but as of now, we do not have any material before us to direct for any relief to the petitioner. The petitioner obviously is a licensee of an earlier Control Order. Under the new Control Order, such licenses have to be ratified and renewed.

For such renewal of license and its ratification under the new Control Order 2016, a time-limit has been fixed.

The application of the petitioner is hopelessly time-barred with respect to that.

Thus, no positive order can be passed in this petition.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

krishna/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          30.01.2023
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter