Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bijay Bahadur Singh @ Bijai ... vs The State Of Bihar Through The ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 2955 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2955 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2022

Patna High Court
Bijay Bahadur Singh @ Bijai ... vs The State Of Bihar Through The ... on 18 May, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2204 of 2021
     ======================================================

Bijay Bahadur Singh @ Bijai Bahadur Singh, Son of Late Ramji Roy @ Ramjee Singh, Resident of Village-Mathila, P.S.-Koransarai, District-Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Higher Education, Patna.

3. Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara through its Registrar.

4. The Vice-Chancellor, Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara.

5. The Registrar, Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara.

6. The Principal, M.V. College, Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, AC to AAG-10 For the Veer Kuwar University: Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vivekanand Pathak, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-05-2022 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner, retired from the post of

Laboratory Incharge of Physics in January 2019, has been

claiming his retiral dues viz., gratuity, leave encashment,

Group insurance and arrears of ACP. The fact of the case is

that the petitionerwas earlier appointed as Laboratory

Incharge of Physics in M.V. College, Buxar as per staffing

pattern in the year 1982 and subsequently, adjusted on the

sanctioned post in the year 2011.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2204 of 2021 dt.18-05-2022

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

on 22.08.2017, the Registrar of the University asked the

concerned College not to take work from the petitioner and

other similarly situated persons against which the petitioner

and others approached this Court in CWJC No. 14653/2017

and during pendency of this writ application, the petitioner

and others were terminated on 29.06.2019 which was also

challenged in the same writ application and ultimately, the

writ application was allowed and order of termination was set

aside.

4. Learned counsel further submits that one

similarly situated person, namely, Rajgrihi Sharma

approached this Court for payment of retiral dues vide CWJC

No. 6257/2109 and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court after

taking into consideration the objection of the University that

an LPA bearing No. 55/2020 has been preferred before the

Division Bench of this Court against the order of the writ

petition filed by the petitioner and other similarly situated

persons passed in CWJC No.14653/2017, directed for

payment of retiral dues subject to the final outcome of the

LPA.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2204 of 2021 dt.18-05-2022

5. Referring to Annexure-12 Series which is an

order passed by this Court in the case of similarly situated writ

petitioners bearing CWJC No. 6257/2019, learned counsel

submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by

the judgment and order of this Court and the present writ

application may be disposed in terms of order passed in

CWJC No. 6257/2019.

6. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing

for the University as well as that of State submit that the State

Government has preferred LPA against the order passed in

CWJC No. 14653/2017 as well as against the writ application

filed by one Rajgrihi Sharma vide CWJC No.6257/2019.

Accordingly, no employee has been paid his retiral dues and

the present petitioner has been paid provident fund only by the

University.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel

for the petitioner that the fact of the case of the petitioner is

squarely covered by the judgment and order passed by this

Court in CWJC No. 6257/2019 and the same has not been

controverted by the learned counsel for the University except Patna High Court CWJC No.2204 of 2021 dt.18-05-2022

the fact that none of the employees has been paid his retiral

dues by the University, I allow this application exactly in

terms of order dated 23.03.2021 passed by this Court in

CWJC No.6257/2019 and the University is directed to make

payments towards retiral/pensionary benefits of the petitioner

within the same period as directed in the aforesaid judgment

passed by this Court.

8. Needless to say that such payments made to the

petitioner would be subject to the final outcome of the LPAs

preferred by the University and the State.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          20.05.2022
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter