Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 724 Patna
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2713 of 2021
======================================================
1. Bina Kumari W/o Arun Kumar Yadav (D/o Chhotelal Yadav) R/o Village-
Bhailahi Ward No. 05, P.O. Ratanpatti, P.S. Murliganj, District-Madhepura.
2. Suresh Kumar S/o Harinandan Prasad Yadav R/o Village-JairampurP.O. and P.S. Murliganj, District-Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary Government of Bihar Patna.
3. The Secretary, General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The District Education officer, Madhepura.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Shekhar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-01-2022
The matter is heard via video conferencing due to
circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19
pandemic.
2. In the instant petition, petitioners have prayed for
following reliefs:-
"(i) The respondents may kindly be directed to ensure selection/ absorption of the petitioners i.e. Ex-non-formal Education Instructors on priority basis who were having advance age/experience/qualification etc. in comparison to others in view of clause (ka) & (kha) of the Govt. Memo No. 945 dated Patna High Court CWJC No.2713 of 2021 dt.28-01-2022
27.4.2017 and other judicial pronouncements/ Executive Instructors.
ii) The respondents also may kindly be directed to remove those candidates who were having lesser age, qualification and experience in like the petitioners who were/are more deserving having prefrontal right in comparison to the others the said wrong or illegality should not be allowed top perpetuate at the hands of model employer certainly run by rule law.
(iii) The respondents further any kindly be directed to ensure strict observance of the reservation roster and other required formalities while making selection in question are making correction while removing delegating the name of undeserving/less deserving candidates) from selection or select 1ist.
(iv) While extending the said relief/the respondents also may kindly be 1ist of the candidates so selected (bearing reason for said selection/ non-election etc.) as demand of fairness and reasonableness to ensure substantial justice.
(v) Any other relief or reliefs also may kindly be directed extended to the petitioners for which the petitioners.
3. Petitioners are hereby directed to submit a
detailed representation along with judicial pronouncements, if
any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of
this order. If such representation is submitted, the concerned Patna High Court CWJC No.2713 of 2021 dt.28-01-2022
respondent is hereby directed to examine the relief sought in the
present petition read with the representation to be submitted
within a period of six months from the date of receipt of
petitioners' representation.
5. With the above observations, the instant petition
stands disposed of.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
rakhi/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!