Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nargis Parween @ Naragish Shahnaj ... vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 611 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 611 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2022

Patna High Court
Nargis Parween @ Naragish Shahnaj ... vs The State Of Bihar on 24 January, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1422 of 2021
     ======================================================

Nargis Parween @ Naragish Shahnaj Praveen W/o Kausar Neazi Resident of Village- Parsadi, P.O.- Parsauna, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar Bihar.

2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, ICDS Directorate, Indira Bhawan, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

5. The District Programme Officer, ICDS Saran at Chapra.

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Parsa, District Saran at Chapra.

7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

8. Sarbjeet Kumar Sah, the Chairman of Selection Committee Parsadi Ward No.11 Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

9. Ramesh Rai, the Member of Selection Committee Parsadi Ward No.11 Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

10. Kanak Lata, Lady Supervisor of Selection Committee Parsadi Ward No.11 Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

11. Lali Shah W/o Baldeo Shah Resident of Village- Parsadi, Post- Parsauna, P.S. Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Kumari Amrita, GP 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-01-2022

The matter is heard via video conferencing due to

circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief/reliefs:

Patna High Court CWJC No.1422 of 2021 dt.24-01-2022

"(I) Issuance of a direction, order or writ including writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the concern respondent authorities to cancel selection of respondent No. 11 on the post of Anganwadi Sevika under Parsadi Ward No. 11 in Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block-Parsa, District - Saran, the selection committee who has been selected in year 2019 on the basis of forged marks sheet and Educational Certificate of Respondent No. 11 so take legal action against the selection committee.

(II) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concern respondent authorities after cancellation / selection of Respondent No. 11, the Respondent authorities may select the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Sevika under Parsadi ward No. 11 in Gram Panchayat Raj Parsauna, Block Parsa, District- Saran.

(III) Any other relief/reliefs that the petitioner may be found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

3. The petitioner without exhausting statutory remedy of

appeal preferred the present petition, thus, it is premature in the

light of Apex Court decision in the case of State of Jammu and

Kashmir V/s. R.K.Zalpuri and others reported in AIR 2016 SC

3006 paragraph-20 in which it is held as under:

"20. Having stated thus, it is useful to refer to a passage form City and Industrial Development Corporation V/s.Dosu Aardeshir Bhiwandiwala and others {(2009) 1 SCC 168}, wherein this Court while dwelling upon jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, has expressed thus:-

"The Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 is duty-bound to consider whether:

(a) Adjudication of writ petition involves any complex and disputed question of facts and whether they can be satisfactorily resolved;

Patna High Court CWJC No.1422 of 2021 dt.24-01-2022

(b) The petition reveals all material facts;

(c) The petitioner has any alternative or effective remedy for the resolution of the dispute;

(d) Person invoking the jurisdiction is guilty of unexplained delay and laches;

(e) Ex facie barred by any laws of limitation;

(f) Grant of relief is against public policy or barred by any valid law; and host of other factors"

4. Accordingly, petition stands disposed off reserving

liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Appellate

Authority within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of

this order. In event of filing of appeal the Appellate Authority is

hereby directed to decide the petitioner's appeal within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of the appeal.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          28.01.2022
Transmission Date




                                                                                Underline Emphasized
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter