Patna High Court
Sadhana Kumari vs The State Bank Of India on 18 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8383 of 2021
======================================================
Sadhana Kumari Wife of Late Binay Kumar Resident of Vihswamohani
Apartment, Flat No. B - 206, Chandmari Road, Near Shalimar Sweets,
Sampatchak, Lohia Nagar, Patna - 800020, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Bank of India Through its General Manager, State Bank of India,
5th Floor, Local head Office, West Ganghi Maidan, Patna - 800001, Bihar
2. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, 8th Floor, Local Head
Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna - 800001, Bihar,
3. The Assistant General Manager, Retail Assets Central Processing Centre,
Patna (RACPC), 1st Floor, Patna Main Branch Building, West Gandhi
Maidan, Patna - 800001, Bihar
4. The Chief Manager, Retail Assets, Central Processing Centre, Patna
(RACPC), 1st Floor, Patna Main Branch Building, West Gandhi Maidan,
Patna- 800001, Bihar
5. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Patna Main Branch, West Gandhi
Maidan, Patna - 800001, Bihar.
6. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 6th
Floor, Patna One Mall, Near Dak Bunglow Chouraha, Patna - 800001, Bihar
7. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 6th Floor,
Patna One Mall, Near Dak Bunglow Chouraha, Patna - 800001, Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navneet Govindam, Advocate
Ms.Aishwarya Shree,, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief
Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their
residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the
proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)
Date : 18-01-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8383 of 2021 dt.18-01-2022
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
"a. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to set aside the impugned order dated 01.09.2020 of
the learned Banking Lokpal;
b. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to the respondent bank to furnish certified copies of
all entries in the banker's book of the record in
relation to the letter dated 29.01.2018 which is the
basis of the impugned order, to the petitioner.
c. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to quash and set aside the notice/letter dated
29.02.2020 served by the respondent no. 3;
d. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to the respondent bank to initiate inquiry into the
genuineness of the letter dated 29.01.2018;
e. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to quash and set aside the concocted letter dated
29.01.2018 as arbitrary, irrational and against the
law;
f. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to respondent bank to rectify the false entries in
relation to the 'amount sanctioned' and 'details of the
property mortgaged' as per the arrangement letter in
their books of record;
g. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to respondent bank and financial institution to
honour the claim of the justified petitioner as per the
arrangement letter and not arbitrarily;
h. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to respondent bank and financial institution to
honour the terms of the arrangement letter and not
arbitrarily;
Patna High Court CWJC No.8383 of 2021 dt.18-01-2022
I. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to respondent bank and financial institution to
follow rules and regulations in its letter and spirit;
j. For issuance of an appropriate writ or direction
to respondent bank to pay exemplary damages to the
petitioner for the arbitrary, discriminatory and
oppressive conduct;
k. Also for any other appropriate relief(s) to which
the petitioner is found entitled either in the eye of
law or in the facts and circumstances of the case."
It is the petitioner's contention that the
Ombudsman of the respondent-bank has dismissed the
petitioner's complaint by accepting the respondents version,
which is based on forgery and act of fraud. As such, petitioner
has approached this Court seeking not only setting aside the
order passed by the Ombudsman but also a direction for
sanctioning the remaining amount and removing the entries of
the mortgaged property.
It is contended that without the petitioner's
knowledge, the residential property was reflected to have been
mortgaged in the loan application.
Since, serious disputed questions of fact are
involved in relation to the agreement entered into between the
parties, to the lis, we deem it appropriate to leave it to the
petitioner to agitate all issues including the correctness of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.8383 of 2021 dt.18-01-2022
order passed by the Ombudsman, in an appropriate forum.
It is not that the petitioner does not have an
equally efficacious alternative remedy. Such fact is not disputed.
We are hopeful that as and when such action is
initiated, the issue would be adjudicated expeditiously and in
accordance with law.
Petition stands disposed of.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
Sujit/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date 22.01.2022
Transmission Date
