Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5435 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1018 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2021 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District-
Bhagalpur
======================================================
Niraj Yadav Son of Bilash Yadav Resident of Mohalla - Bari Khanjarpur, P.S.- Barari, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Deepak Kumar son of Pago Das R/o Bari khanjarpur, P.O.- Khanjarpur, P.S.-
Barari, Distt- Bhagalpur
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-12-2022
Service report sent through ordinary process shows
the mother of the informant received the notice.
Learned Spl.PP also submits that the informant was
intimated through Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur
about the proceeding taking place in this Court but none is
present on behalf of the informant/respondent no.2.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned
Spl.PP for the State.
Let the defect (s), if any, as pointed out by the office,
be removed within a period of four weeks.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1018 of 2022 dt.22-12-2022
Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by
order dated 14.02.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Judge-III-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Bhagalpur in
connection with Special SC/ST Case No. 17 of 2021 arising out
of Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2021 registered for the
alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307
and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 (1)(r)(s)(v) of
the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act.
As per the prosecution case, the appellant and other
co-accused persons hurled caste abuses against the informant
and when he oppose, the petitioner stabbed him with his knife
in his chest and abdomen. The informant felt unconscious and
he was taken to the hospital.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
case. No occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. The
occurrence took place on 07.02.2021 and the FIR has been
registered on 11.02.2021 and there is no explanation for this
inordinate delay. As there was no intention to murder, there
would be no application of Section 307 IPC against the
appellant. The allegation of hurling caste abuse is ornamental. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1018 of 2022 dt.22-12-2022
The appellant is in custody since 02.11.2021 and charge-sheet
has been submitted.
Learned Spl.PP opposes the submission made on
behalf of the appellant submitting that there is specific
allegation against this appellant that he gave knife blows to the
informant in his chest and abdomen. The appellant is having
criminal antecedent.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
considering the submission made on behalf of the parties and
considering the period of custody of the petitioner along with
the submission of charge sheet against this appellant, he
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-
III-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Bhagalpur in connection
with Special SC/ST Case No. 17 of 2021 arising out of Kotwali
(Barari) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2021, subject to the conditions
mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. and the following
conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
appellant.
(ii) The appellant will remain present on each and Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1018 of 2022 dt.22-12-2022
every date fixed by the court below.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or
in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of
the appellant will be liable to be cancelled by the
court concerned.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the
appeal is allowed.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Rajnish/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 24.12.2022 Transmission Date 24.12.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!