Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5322 Patna
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3044 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Patna
======================================================
Amit Kumar @ Kaju S/o Sri Ashok Saw @ Ashok Gupta Resident of New Sarak Chowk, Mangal Talab, Jamuna Ji Ka Math, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna.
... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Sheela Devi W/o Sri Sanjeet Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan Resident of Village-
Marcha, P.S.- Bypass, District- Patna
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-12-2022
Perusal of office report shows notice has been validly
served upon the respondent no.2. But none is present on behalf
of the respondent no. 2. Hence, the matter has been put up for
hearing.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned
Spl.PP for the State.
Let the defect (s), if any, as pointed out by the office,
be removed within a period of four weeks.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3044 of 2022 dt.19-12-2022
order dated 27.07.2022 passed by learned Exclusive Special
Court, (SC/ST) Act, Patna in Serial No. 130 of 2022 arising out
of SC/ST P.S. Case No.12 of 2022 registered for the alleged
offences under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 427, 447, 448, 504
and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s)(w)
and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
As per the prosecution case, the informant named the
petitioner and other FIR named co-accused persons, who
entered into her house, abused her by taking caste name and
threatened her that she should vacate the house and the land.
They assaulted the informant and her family members.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
case. The whole occurrence took place inside the house of the
informant as it was not a public place hence, provisions of the
SC/ST Act would not be applicable. There is land dispute
between the parties and they are contesting the title suit
pertaining to property as described in Schedule-1 and Schedule-
A of the plaint of the Title Suit No. 181 of 2020. Two of the co-
accused persons facing similar allegation have been allowed
privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 22.09.2022 Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3044 of 2022 dt.19-12-2022
passed in Cr. App (SJ) No. 2848 of 2022. The appellant is in
custody since 27.06.2022 and charge-sheet has been submitted.
The appellant has got no criminal history.
Learned Spl.PP opposes the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
considering the submission made on behalf of the parties and
considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the
background of land dispute and further considering the grant of
anticipatory bail to similarly placed co-accused persons and
also considering the clean antecedent of the appellant along
with the period of custody of the appellant and submission of
charge sheet, he directed to be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive
Special Court (SC/ST) Act, Patna in connection with SC/ST
P.S. Case No. 12 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned
in Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. and the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
appellant.
(ii) The appellant will remain present on each and
every date fixed by the court below.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3044 of 2022 dt.19-12-2022
in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of
the appellant will be liable to be cancelled by the
court concerned.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the
appeal is allowed.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) himanshu/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19.12.2022 Transmission Date 19.12.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!