Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5055 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20549 of 2019
======================================================
Dynamic Infra and Services India Pvt. Ltd. through its Director, Manoj Kumar Gupta, aged about 64 years, Gender-Male, S/o Deo Nath Gupta, resident of Mohalla-Sadikpur Sarai Lane, P.O.-Gulzarbagh, P.S.-Alamganj, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Patna.
5. The Medical Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna
6. The Director, S.D. Medical System, Nandan Bhawan, Near Sur Sudha Apartment, East Boring Canal Road, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Vishwakarma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Birju Prasad (GP 13) Ms.Sweta Anand, AC to G.P. 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 12-12-2022
Petitioner has prayed for following relief (s) : -
"(a) Issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing/set aside the allotment of Tender dated 09.08.2018 subsequent to the Advertisement which was issued vide Memo no.5119 dated 29.05.2018 published by the Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital (in short P.M.C.H.), Patna by which respondent authorities in complete violation of the terms of the advertisement, allotted the work to Private Respondent no.6 i.e. M/s S.D. Medical System who was not even fit for selection in Technical bid but on extraneous consideration, the respondent authorities, violating the term and condition as mentioned in tender notice dated Patna High Court CWJC No.20549 of 2019 dt.12-12-2022
29.05.2018 made selection vide order dated 09.08.2018 which is against the law and thus entire selection process is not tenable in the eye of law, hence fit to be set-aside/quashed.
(b) Issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the petitioner as success full tenderer who has the lowest price amongst other qualified tenderer who fulfill all the terms and conditions as defined under the Advertisement dated 29.05.2018.
(c) The respondents further be directed to issue work order in favour of the petitioner after cancellation of allotment of work dated 09.08.2018 to the Private respondent no.6
d) To grant any other relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled be awarded to him."
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, with
the passage of time, the present petition has become
infructuous, inasmuch as the tender period stands expired.
As such, the present petition stands dismissed,
having become infructuous.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
sujit/chn AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 17.12.2022 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!