Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1643 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8106 of 2021
======================================================
Amar Dev Pandey, son of Radhey Shyam Pandey, resident of Village - Hasanpura, P.O. - Nasirpur, P.S. - Gazipur, District- Uttar Pradesh, Pin Code - 232339.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. Secretary, Law Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna through its Secretary.
4. Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna.
5. Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna.
6. Joint Secretary- cum - Controller of Examinations, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Manisha Pandey, Advocate
Ms. Shweta Pandey, Advocate
Mr. Vishwanath Pandey, Advocate
For the State : Mr. G.P. Ojha, GA-7
For the Commission : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY)
Date : 23-03-2021
Heard the parties.
In the present case, the petitioner is raising his grievance
with respect to three questions i.e. Question Nos. 58, 126 and 133 Patna High Court CWJC No.8106 of 2021 dt.23-03-2021
of Set -D of question booklet of 31st Bihar Judicial Services
(Preliminary) Competitive Examination.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has wrongly
been declared unsuccessful in the aforesaid Preliminary
Examination as his name could not find place in the list of
successful candidates.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Commission
has wrongly given 'B' is the correct answer of question no. 58 of
Booklet-D, but in fact 'C' is the correct answer. With regard to
question no.126 of the same booklet, the Commission has wrongly
given 'C' is the correct answer, but in fact 'D' is the correct
answer. With regard to question no. 133 of the same booklet, the
Commission has wrongly given 'C' is the correct answer, but in
fact 'B' is the correct answer.
After examination was conducted, the Commission has
issued a notice dated 19.12.2020 in its website, asking the
candidates that the model answer (provisional) would be available
on the website if any candidate has to raise objection with regard
to any item of model answer, they are at liberty to do the same, but
it must reach on or before 31.12.2020 at 5.00 P:M in close
envelope mentioning the advertisement number and that will be
looked into by the Expert and after discussing the objection so Patna High Court CWJC No.8106 of 2021 dt.23-03-2021
raised by the different candidates, final answer list will be
prepared. This is the standard procedure followed by all the
examining body.
Counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that he failed
to raise any objection on the ground that he was staying in village
due to Covid 19, but one thing is very much clear that it is
published in the website and the petitioner should have remained
vigilant as now in the village area internet is working or if internet
is not working, he should have remained cautious to find out when
the model answer is to be published and he should take care of.
It is admitted fact that the petitioner has not raised any
objection with regard to the model answer given in the notice and
after the final result, the writ application has been filed taking a
plea that due to pandemic, the petitioner was in village and, as
such, he could not take steps to raise objection, inasmuch as, in the
advertisement, there is no such procedure has been prescribed that
after the examination will be conducted, the model answer will be
published in the website asking the candidates to raise objection.
So, the Commission cannot change the procedure in the midway,
whereas the Commission says that it is a standard procedure,
which is adopted by every examining body in order to make the
candidate to sure the answer, which has been given as correct or Patna High Court CWJC No.8106 of 2021 dt.23-03-2021
incorrect answer, so opportunity has been given to each and every
candidate to suggest the answer, which is, according to the
candidate, is wrong, same will be looked into by the Expert body
and if it is found that the suggestion given by the candidate is
correct then the answer has to be modified accordingly.
Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a
judgment in the case of Ashutosh Kumar Jha and Ors. Vs. The
State of Bihar and Ors. (LPA No. 1235 of 2016 with analogous
cases). In that case, the Court has decided the standard procedure
to be followed in resolving the dispute with regard to the objection
raised by the petitioners. In paragraph 17, it has specifically been
mentioned that "In our opinion, this Court, sitting in writ
jurisdiction exercising power of judicial review, should not go into
the correctness or otherwise of the opinion of Experts Body and it
is not required to sit over such judgment of Experts Body unless it
appears to be obnoxious. This Court is not required to go deep into
the correctness of answers on the basis of pleadings and counter
pleadings and come to its own conclusion about the correctness or
otherwise of the opinion of the Experts Body".
This Court, in judicial review, will not act as appellate body
to the decision taken by the expert body unless it is shown to be Patna High Court CWJC No.8106 of 2021 dt.23-03-2021
perverse as no reasonable person would arrive to such final
answer.
Admittedly the petitioner has failed to raise objection as
per the notice published in website of the Commission and now,
after the final result of preliminary test, he is raising objection
about the correctness of answers which he cannot be allowed to
take round and challenge the answers.
In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any
merit in this writ application and, accordingly, the same is
dismissed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
( Partha Sarthy, J) V.K.Pandey/-
AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R. CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date 23.03.2021 Transmission Date N.A.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!