Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 3355 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3355 Patna
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Patna High Court
Chandan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 13 July, 2021
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37096 of 2021
       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2020 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali
 ======================================================

Chandan Kumar, aged about 24 years (Male), son of Shree Rajesh Paswan, resident of village- Madhusudan Pakri, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-07-2021

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis

of motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on

08.07.2021, which was allowed.

3. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, learned

Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the

'APP') for the State.

4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with

Lalganj PS Case No. 326 of 2020 dated 24.10.2020, instituted

under Sections 363, 366-A of the Indian Penal Code.

5. The petitioner, along with his family members, is

accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37096 of 2021 dt.13-07-2021

alleging that the petitioner was a teacher in the coaching class

she attended and he had abducted her for the purpose of

marriage.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the allegation is totally false and concocted. It was submitted

that the petitioner has no role in any abduction and the same did

not occur and, in fact, the girl herself had run away from her

house and had called the petitioner and they had married in a

temple out of their own free will. It was submitted that the girl

has made statement before the Court under Section 164 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as

the 'Code') in which the Court has assessed her age as 18 years

and she herself has stated her age to be 19 years i.e., being

major and has further stated that on 22.10.2020, she had gone

from Lalganj to Muzaffapur after taking the petitioner and on

26.10.2020, had married in Hariharnath temple and that she was

not kidnapped and had married on her own free will. It was

submitted that the girl was, thus, major and most importantly,

she is now living in the house of the petitioner. It was contended

that the petitioner and her family members have accepted her in

the house and shall keep her with full dignity, honour and

security and she will be given her due place as the wife of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37096 of 2021 dt.13-07-2021

petitioner.

7. Learned APP submitted that the allegation is of

abduction of the minor daughter of the informant, the petitioner

being the main accused. However, in view of the statement of

the girl under Section 164 of the Code, copy of which has been

brought on record as Annexure-2, it was not controverted that

the so-called victim girl has stated that she was major and had

married the petitioner after herself leaving the house and there

was no abduction.

8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in

the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within

six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon

furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Vaishali at

Hajipur, in Lalganj PS Case No. 326 of 2020, subject to the

conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 and further (i) that one of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner shall

cooperate with the Court and the police/prosecution and (iii)

that the petitioner shall give undertaking to the Court that he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37096 of 2021 dt.13-07-2021

shall keep the informant with him with full honour, dignity and

security and shall provide for all her needs. Any violation of the

terms and conditions of the undertaking or failure to cooperate

shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

9. It shall also be open for the informant/her

guardians/prosecution to bring any violation of the foregoing

conditions of bail by the petitioner, to the notice of the Court

concerned, which shall take immediate action on the same after

giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

10. The petition stands disposed off in the

aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

J. Alam/-

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter