Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shanti Bhushan Arya @ Shanti ... vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 820 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 820 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021

Patna High Court
Shanti Bhushan Arya @ Shanti ... vs The State Of Bihar on 10 February, 2021
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9109 of 2021
   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN District-
                                      Aurangabad
======================================================

Shanti Bhushan Arya @ Shanti Bhushan Kumar Arya @ Shanti Narayan Arya, aged about 48 years (Male), Son of Late Raghuni Ram, Resident Of Purandarpur Kesho Path, P.S- Jakkanpur, P.O- G.P.O Patna, District Patna, The Then District Welfare Officer, Aurangabad, At Present Posted as Deputy Director, Welfare Department, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. P K Shahi, Sr. Advocate with
                               Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the                :       Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, APP

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-02-2021

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. P K Shahi, learned senior counsel along

with Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner

and Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

Aurangabad Town PS Case No. 266 of 2018 dated 11.09.2018

instituted under Sections 420, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal

Code.

4. This is the second attempt for bail by the petitioner as

earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 17.06.2020 in

Cr. Misc. No. 71694 of 2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9109 of 2021 dt.10-02-2021

5. The allegation against the petitioner is that he being

the District Welfare Officer had defalcated the Government

money meant for scholarship to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled

Tribe students.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after

two years of his transfer from the post of District Welfare

Officer, Aurangabad on a complaint by a private person against

the Principal of one such college, whose students were also

given scholarship, a three-member committee was constituted to

enquire, which has given a report that funds were transferred in

a highly illegal manner and paid to fictitious students for which

criminal case was instituted and the petitioner was also made

accused.

7. Learned counsel submitted that the enquiry was

without notice to him or giving opportunity to explain with

regard to the funds which may have been allocated by him at the

relevant point of time. It was submitted that even otherwise the

petitioner cannot be accused of embezzling or defalcating

Government money sent to the respective colleges that too

based on the report of the office. Thus, it was submitted that if

there is any irregularity, the staff who gave a report with regard

to the claim of the college is responsible. Learned counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9109 of 2021 dt.10-02-2021

submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2019.

8. Learned APP submitted that the petitioner was

required to transfer the fund directly through RTGS to the

beneficiaries and instead sending the funds through cheque to

the colleges for payment to students clearly indicates that the

modus operandi was alien to the rules prescribed leading to

defalcation of Government money. It was submitted that the

petitioner is solely and wholly responsible for such conduct and

most importantly there are two other cases of similar nature

pending against him of the year 2017 whereas this case has been

lodged in the year 2018.

9. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the

Court does not find that any ground has been made to re-

consider the prayer which was earlier rejected on 17.06.2020.

10. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

Anjani/-

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter