Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar Through The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 6404 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6404 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2021

Patna High Court
Jitendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar Through The ... on 23 December, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17462 of 2021
     ======================================================

Jitendra Kumar, Son of Sri Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village - Bhola Bigha, P.S. Islampur, District Nalanda. At present Resident of Brahmpur, Jaganpur, P.S. Ram Krishna Nagar, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Patna.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kotwali, District Patna.

5. The Officer - in - Charge, Ram Krishna Nagar Police Station, District Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore ( Ag ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

Date : 23-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

(I) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authority to release the vehicle Glamour Motorcycle bearing Registration No.BR01EL-5610, Chassis No.MBLJAW100KGJ20698, Engine No.JA06ERKG19875 which was seized in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 263/2021 dated 1.8.2021 registered under Sections 30(a)/37(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018 in favour of the petitioner who is owner of the vehicle.

(ii) And for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the eye of law."

Allegation is recovery of 500 ml. of illicit liquor from

the possession of one Pintu Kumar who was sitting in between

two persons on the motorcycle giving rise to Gopalpur P.S. Patna High Court CWJC No.17462 of 2021 dt.23-12-2021

Case No. 263/2021 dated 1.8.2021 registered under Sections

30(a)/37(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018.

Petitioner claims to be the owner of the said vehicle

and only 500 ml. illicit liquor has been recovered from

possession of co-accused, Pintu Kumar, who was sitting in

between petitioner and other co-accused and they were found in

the drunken condition. It is further submitted that no

confiscation proceeding has been initiated till date.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the

concerned District Magistrate/Confiscating officer, Patna is

directed to initiate confiscation proceeding, if not already

initiated and provisionally release the vehicle of petitioner after

due identification of ownership of the vehicle which was seized

by the police in excise case on production of ownership and

registration papers with respect to vehicle in question in his

name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of

the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.

The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also

furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any

third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the

pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate Patna High Court CWJC No.17462 of 2021 dt.23-12-2021

the vehicle during this period.

(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to

produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and

when required.

(iii)Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama

would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall

be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and same shall be

kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as

a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an

undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14

days from the date of submission of the sureties and the

undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject

to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

With said observations and direction, this writ

petition is disposed of.


                                                 (Sanjay Karol, CJ)


                                                     ( S. Kumar, J)
Sanjay/- Ranjan
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter