Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Md. Zaheer @ Md. Zaheer vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 6232 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6232 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Patna High Court
Dr. Md. Zaheer @ Md. Zaheer vs The State Of Bihar on 17 December, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6450 of 2020
     ======================================================

Dr. Md. Zaheer @ Md. Zaheer Son of Shekh Mohammad Sayeed Resident of Station Road, Near Bazar Samiti, Banjariya, P.S.- Town Motihari, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar.

2. The Additional Secretary Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate cum President District Health Committee, West Champaran at Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

4. The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer West Champaran at Bettiah.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh (GA 10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-12-2021 This matter has been heard via video conferencing due

to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19

Pandemic.

Heard learned counsels for respective parties.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:-

"(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to No. 261(9) dated 09.02.2012 No. quash Memo the (Annexure-5) issued under signature of the Health Department, Additional Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna (Petitioner no. 2). Whereby and where under the petitioner re-suspended under Rule 9 (2)(K) of Bihar Government Patna High Court CWJC No.6450 of 2020 dt.17-12-2021

Employee (Classification control and Appeal) Rule 2005.

(ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents vacate the suspension of the petitioner and pay full salary which has dues with the suitable interest till date.

(iii) To grant any other relief/reliefs, order/orders for which the petitioner is entitle under law as well as on fact."

During pendency of the present petition it is learnt that

inquiry was concluded in imposition of penalty and petitioner

intends to challenge such order.

The concerned respondent is hereby directed to regulate

the suspension period in accordance with law within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of this order.

The petitioner is at liberty to question the validity of

penalty order in filing a fresh petition since cause of action

accrued during pendency of the present petition.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition

stands disposed off.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Vikash/-

AFR/NAFR              NAFAR
CAV DATE              N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date     N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter