Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shashikant Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5904 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5904 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021

Patna High Court
Shashikant Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 7 December, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1423 of 2021
     ======================================================

Shashikant Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Birendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village

- Khaira Ajam, P.O. - Reotith, P.S. - Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt.

of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.

4. The Collector cum Chairman District Level Selection Committee (Supply), Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj.

5. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

6. The District Transport Officer, Gopalganj Cum Member of the Selection Committee of District Level (Supply), District - Gopalganj.

7. The District Co-Operative Officer, Gopalganj, Cum Member of the Selection Committee of District Level (Supply), District - Gopalganj.

8. The District Supply Officer, Gopalganj Cum Member of the Selection Committee of District Level (Supply), District - Gopalganj.

9. The Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, Gopalganj Cum Member of the Selection Committee of District Level (Supply), District - Gopalganj.

10. The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Licensing Authority, Sadar Sub Division, Gopalganj.

11. The Block Supply Officer, Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj.

12. Mr. Raj Balam Ram, S/ Ramjit Ram, Resident of Village - Bankati, P.O. -

Mahua, P.S. Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (A.G.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 07-12-2021

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1423 of 2021 dt.07-12-2021

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).

"A. A writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the recommendation iii the District Level Selection Committee (supply), Gopalganj dated 31.08.2020 contained in memo no. 677 to the extent the same relates to recommendation of private respondent for license of PDS dealership for supply of Essential goods for the beneficiaries/ consumers of Khaira Ajam, Gram Panchayat of Baikunthpur Block of the Gopalganj District, figures at SI. No. 81 in the recommendation list under unreserved category.

B. A writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order/s, direction/s commanding the respondents for the followings:

i. To direct the respondent authorities to review the recommendation with respect to private respondent and declare the petitioner to be most eligible in comparison of the private respondent.

ii. To hold that the recommendation of the private respondent who is at 5th position in the seniority list of approved applicants and non-recommendation of the petitioner, who is having 1st position in the said seniority list is erroneous and gross case of colorable exercise of power.

iii. To hold that the private respondent is not eligible for the PDS Dealership of Gram Panchayat Raj, Khaira Ajam as he does not hold the essential/required eligibility for the same.

C. For any other relief/s to which the petitioner is found entitled to."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned

counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall be content if Patna High Court CWJC No.1423 of 2021 dt.07-12-2021

a direction is issued to the appellate authority, which the

petitioner would be filing within next four weeks.

Learned counsel for the State states that if the

petitioner were to file the appeal in terms of the averments made

in para- 29 of the affidavit, within four weeks, the appellate

authority shall decide the same on merits within a period of two

months thereafter in accordance with law.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

Petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority

concerned to consider and decide the petitioner's appeal

expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from

the date of presentation of appeal.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid

terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands

disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajiv-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date       NA

Patna High Court CWJC No.1423 of 2021 dt.07-12-2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter