Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishwajit Kumar Bharti @ Bittu vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 4118 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4118 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2021

Patna High Court
Vishwajit Kumar Bharti @ Bittu vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 37715 of 2020
           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda
      ======================================================

Vishwajit Kumar Bharti @ Bittu, aged about 24 years, Gender-Male Son of Vinod Paswan, Resident of Village- Bokna, PS- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Gulafsa Nasreen, age- 22 years, Gender- Female, Wife of Vishwajit Kumar Bharti @ Bittu, Resident of Village- Bokna, PS- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

      For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate
      For the State            :        Mr. Md. Arif, APP

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-08-2021

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with

Mahila PS Case No. 37 of 2020 dated 07.03.2020, instituted

under Sections 376, 313, 506 and 377/34 of the Indian Penal

Code.

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had

established physical relationship with the informant and also put

vermilion on her forehead and had stated that now she was his

wife and at that time she was carrying a foetus of four and a half Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37715 of 2020 dt.16-08-2021

months and later it has been alleged that the petitioner used to

abuse her physically.

5. On 20.07.2021, learned counsel for the petitioner on

earlier occasion had submitted that without going in the merits, as

of now, both the parties have affirmed affidavit on 13.08.2020 that

they were living together as husband and wife. It was submitted

that the Court may get such fact verified from the authorities

concerned.

6. In view of such stand, learned APP was required to

obtain a report from the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda with

regard to the present status of the relationship between the

petitioner and the informant-opposite party no. 2, especially

from the opposite party no. 2 as to whether she was living

together with the petitioner out of her own free will.

7. Learned APP submitted that the Superintendent of

Police, Nalanda has submitted a report dated 04.08.2021, which

has also been brought before the Court to which is annexed the

report of the SHO, Mahila PS, Nalanda as also the hand written

statement of the informant-opposite party no. 2 dated 01.08.2021

in which she has stated that after marriage she has been living well

in the matrimonial home and that her expenses relating to studies Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37715 of 2020 dt.16-08-2021

was also being borne by her father-in-law i.e., father of the

petitioner and that she has no grievance.

8. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is keeping

the opposite party no. 2 in his house as his wife and that she has

been accepted in the family and presently has no grievance, the

Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before

the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be

released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/-

(twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Nalanda at Biharsharif in

Mahila PS Case No. 37 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid

down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

and further, (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute

bond and give undertaking with regard to good behaviour of the

petitioner (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an undertaking to

the Court that he shall keep the informant-opposite party no. 2 in

the matrimonial home with full dignity, honour and security and

shall take care of all her needs and that she shall be free to visit,

talk to or meet any person she desires, without any let or

hindrance by him or his family members and (iv) that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37715 of 2020 dt.16-08-2021

petitioner shall co-operate with the Court and police/prosecution.

Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the

undertaking or failure to co-operate shall lead to cancellation of

his bail bonds.

10. It shall also be open for the prosecution and the

informant-opposite party no. 2/her guardians to bring any

violation of the foregoing conditions of bail by the petitioner, to

the notice of the Court concerned, which shall take immediate

action on the same after giving opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner.

11. The petition stands disposed of in the

aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

P. Kumar

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter