Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3972 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15176 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-716 Year-2020 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District-
Bhagalpur
======================================================
Vikash Kumar Choudhary @ Vikash Choudhary, aged about 30 years, Male, Son of Madan Choudhary, Resident of Village - Mayaganj mushari Tola, P.S.- Barari, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Ms. Meena Singh, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-08-2021
The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis of
motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on
29.07.2021, which was allowed.
3. Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Ms. Meena Singh, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 716 of 2020 dated 19.11.2020,
instituted under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. As per the informant, his motorcycle was stolen
during night for which the present case has been instituted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15176 of 2021 dt.05-08-2021
However, it is not against any named person and during
investigation co-accused Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Golu Yadav
was arrested by the police and he disclosed that the stolen
motorcycle was kept by him at the house of the petitioner and
thereafter when the police has gone to the house of the petitioner,
from his courtyard, motorcycle was recovered.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
though from the circumstances, it appears that there is recovery of
stolen motorcycle from the courtyard of the petitioner but from the
seizure list, there being no signature of any inmate of the house,
raises serious doubts with regard to authenticity of the allegation
of such recovery from the house of the petitioner. It was submitted
that only the said co-accused Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Golu
Yadav has signed on the seizure list. He submitted that the
petitioner has got no other criminal antecedent.
7. Learned APP submitted that during investigation,
from the CCTV footage two miscreants were seen committing
theft and one has been identified as Chandan Kumar Yadav @
Golu Yadav by the local person Sonu Kumar and he was
apprehended. Learned counsel submitted that once the co-accused
had gone with the police and recovery has been made and he has
signed on the seizure list, the requirement of any other signature of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15176 of 2021 dt.05-08-2021
the inmates of the house cannot be fatal to the prosecution and all
such matters are to be left at the stage of trial where evidence
would be adduced by the respective parties, but for the present,
there is strong presumption of guilt and involvement of the
petitioner in committing the crime.
8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court
finds substance in the contention of learned APP. Thus, the Court
is not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
9. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
AFR/NAFR U T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!