Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manas Ranjan vs Sub Divisional .... Opposite Parties
2026 Latest Caselaw 2287 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2287 Ori
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Manas Ranjan vs Sub Divisional .... Opposite Parties on 12 March, 2026

Author: V. Narasingh
Bench: V. Narasingh
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                          CRLREV No. 190 of 2026

       1. Manas Ranjan                ...           Petitioners
       Samal
       2. Jyoti Ranjan Mallick
                                      Mr. B. Nayak, Advocate

                                -versus-
      1. Sub Divisional               ....    Opposite Parties
         Magistrate,
         Jagatsinghpur
      2. Tahasildar, Biridi
                                      Mr. M. R. Mohanty, AGA

                           CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
                                 ORDER

12.03.2026 Order No.

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 13.02.2026 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jagatsinghpur in Misc Case No. 14 of 2026 in exercise of power under Section 152 of BNSS, the present Criminal Revision has been filed.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Petitioners have received work order for executing several developmental works under the territorial jurisdiction of the Tahasildar Biridi and in order to execute such work, they had procured the sand and

because there was lack of space to keep the same, in view the urgency involved in finishing the projects allotted to them in a timebound manner, they were constrained to keep the sand in a public place.

4. Taking into account that it has resulted in an alleged public nuisance and unlawful obstruction of public way and "injurious to the health/safety of the community in terms of Section 152 of the BNSS, show cause was issued to the Petitioners on 07.02.2026, pursuant to which they submitted their show cause on 09.02.2026, inter alia, indicating the difficulties they were facing and they had no other alternative.

5. Taking into account the show cause, the Sub Collector Jagatsinghpur, passed the order dated 10.02.2026 directing the Petitioners to lift the sand within 3 days.

For convenience of the reference, the operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder:-

"The case record is put up today for order. Both Parties were present. Perused the report received from the Tahasildar, Biridi vide letter no.302 dtd. 06.02.2025 regarding large quantities of sand are being illegally dumped/stored along the roadside by the O.Ps over Govt. plot No.1170 under Khata No.1241 of village Adhanga Majurai, Govt. plot No.1877 under Khata No.649, private plot No.1348 under khata No.148/10 under village Barahpur and Deity plot No.754 under Khata No.1395 of village Adhangagarh.

The report further indicates that this dumping is creating a public nuisance, causing severe, inconvenience to commuters, blocking the public right-of-way, and damaging nearby arable lands due to improper disposal, causing substantial financial loss to farmers.

Upon perusal of the report & considering the material available on record, I am satisfied that this activity falls under the category of a public nuisance, unlawful obstruction of a public way, and an activity injurious to the health/safety of the community, as per Section 152 of BNSS, 2023.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered and the OPs are responsible for the dumping of high quantity of sand to remove the said sand and clear the obstruction from the public road within three days from the date of this order. Tahaslidar, Biridi is directed to immediately take administrative control of the property, coordinate with local law enforcement to evict the unauthorised occupants and secure the Govt. land to prevent future trespass and potential damage/nuisance.

It is hereby ordered to Opp.No.1 & 2 to submit work order of construction work within 2 days and not to lift the sand without the permission of the undersigned. The case is posted to 13th February2026."

6. And, since the time limit as fixed, expired on 13.02.2026, the impugned order has been passed, whereby the direction has been issued to sell the sand by public auction and the sale proceeds to be deposited with the Revenue Authority.

7. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that in passing the impugned order, the Sub Divisional Magistrate-Opp. Party No.1 acted with undue

haste and lost sight of the practical difficulties being faced by the Petitioners which was delineated in the show cause referred to hereinabove.

And, it is submitted that the manner in which the Petitioners have been asked to remove the sand within 3 working days is ex facie arbitrary which merits interference by this Court.

8. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand submits that the prayer as made by the Petitioners if granted would amount to giving license to the violation of Section 152 of the BNSS and therefore, the criminal revision ought not to be entertained.

It is further submitted that ventilating their grievance the Petitioners could have approached the higher authorities including the Collector and having not done so, the Petitioners have rushed to this Court and the criminal revision is liable to rejected on the said ground alone.

9. On considering the rival submissions and weighing the same on the scale of equity, this Court is of the considered view that directing the Petitioners to remove the sand in question within a period of 7 days hence would meet the ends of justice.

10. The Petitioners shall submit an affidavit to the said effect in this Court by tomorrow i.e. 13.03.2026. The same shall form part of the record.

In the event, the sand is not removed within 7 days hence as undertaken, it shall be open for the

authorities to take action in accordance with law and this Court will also consider to initiate proceeding against the Petitioners for violating the undertaking given to this Court.

11. For the reasons, as aforesaid, the impugned order at Annexure-4 is set aside.

12. Accordingly, the criminal revision stands disposed of.

13. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 14-Mar-2026 14:02:11

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter