Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 152 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2026
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
WP(C) No.35230 of 2025
An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India.
***
Jayanti Biswas & Others ... Petitioners.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others ... Opposite Parties.
Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Niranjan Panda, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.
(For the State)
P R E S E N T:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Date of Hearing : 08.01.2026 :: Date of Judgment : 08.01.2026
J UDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners
praying for directing the Tahasildar, Kalimela (Opp. Party No.4)
in the district of Malkangiri for deletion of the name of Mr.
Laxman Biswas from the R.o.R. vide Khata No.181/61 in Mouza-
Erbanpali, because, Mr. Laxman Biswas has expired.
2. Heard from the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.
3. It is the settled propositions of law that, for deletion of the
name of a recorded tenant from a R.o.R on the ground of his/her
death, a Mutation Case is to be registered on the basis of an
application submitted by a interested party, who is interested for
deletion of the name of such dead person from the R.o.R and
then, an enquiry is to be conducted by the Tahasildar and
thereafter, necessary order may be passed by the Tahasildar for
deletion/exclusion of the name of the dead recorded tenant from
the R.o.R and in his place, the names of his/her LRs be
indicated.
For which, High Court, cannot pass a blanket order in this
Writ Petition directing the Tahasildar, Kalimela (O.P. No.4) for
deletion of the name of a dead person from the R.o.R, because,
for deletion of the name of a dead person from the R.o.R, some
formalities as per law are required to be made before the
Tahasildar through a Mutation Proceeding.
4. In view of the above settled propositions of law, there is no
justification under law to allow the writ petition filed by the
petitioners in full.
For which, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is to be
allowed in part.
5. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is allowed
in part.
6. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to file an application
before the Tahasildar, Kalimela praying for deletion/exclusion of
the name of dead person i.e. Laxman Biswas from the R.o.R.
vide Khata No.181/61 in Mouza-Erbanpali and on the basis of
such application, the Tahasildar, Kalimela shall register a
Mutation Case and he shall conduct an enquiry and then, he
shall pass the necessary orders for the same.
7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is
disposed of finally.
(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 08 .01. 2026// Rati Ranjan Nayak Sr. Stenographer
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!