Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sishupal Majhi vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 9059 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9059 Ori
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025

Orissa High Court

Sishupal Majhi vs State Of Odisha on 15 October, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                           CRLA No.401 of 2020

       Sishupal Majhi                   .....      Appellants/Petitioners

                                                 Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra,
                                                 Advocate

                                      -versus-

       State of Odisha                  .....    Respondent/Opp. Party

                                                 Mr. P.S. Nayak, AGA


                             CORAM:
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA

                                   ORDER
Order No.                         15.10.2025
                               I.A. No. 762 of 2020

11. This is an application for bail.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) in default, to undergo R.I. for one month by the learned Sessions Judge, Kalahandi, Bhawanipatna in C.T. Case No.51 of 2015 arising out of Kesinga P.S. Case No.82 of 2015.

Perused the impugned judgment.

Learned counsel for the State has produced the custody certificate of the appellant-petitioner, which shows that he is in judicial custody for eight years seven months. He has also produced the report from the Superintendent of District Jail, Bhawanipatna to show that the conduct of the petitioner inside the jail is satisfactory. He has not committed any prison offence and maintaining a peaceful and discipline life. The reports are taken on record.

Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant- petitioner submits that the prosecution case is mainly based on the evidence of three eye witnesses i.e. P.Ws.7, 8 and 19 so also the evidence of the doctor (P.W.16), who conducted the postmortem examination. He further submits that there was some quarrel between the deceased and the appellant for which assault took place and since there are no chances of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, the bail application may be favourbly considered.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and specifically stated that the appellant- petitioner dealt the knife blow on the back of the deceased and the evidence of the doctor corroborates the version of the eye witnesses and the doctor has stated that the cause of death of the deceased was due

to hemorrhage and hypovolemic shock. Considering the submissions made by learned counsels for the respective parties, in view of the three eye witnesses so also the medical evidence, while not inclining to release the appellant-petitioner on bail on merit, but taking in to account the period of detention of the appellant-petitioner in judicial custody for more than seven years and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future and keeping in view the principle laid down by this Court in Leti @ Jayadeb Roy and another Vrs. The State reported in (1990) 3 Orissa Criminal Reports 427, we are inclined to release the appellant-petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of his release. The petitioner shall surrender before the learned trial Court on expiry of three months period.

For the above period, let the appellant-petitioner be released on interim bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court subject to condition that while on interim bail the appellant-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activities in any manner.

Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of interim bail.

The I.A. is disposed of accordingly. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.S. Mishra) Judge

12. This is an application for stay of realization of fine.

Heard.

After hearing the learned counsels for both the parties, there shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kalahandi in C.T. Case No.51 of 2015 on the appellant-petitioner, till disposal of the criminal appeal.

The I.A. is disposed of.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.S. Mishra) Judge

13. Put up this matter in the week commencing from 27th January, 2026.

Learned counsel for appellant-petitioner shall file the surrender certificate of appellant on the next date.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.S. Mishra) Ashok/Swarna Judge

Designation: Senior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Oct-2025 15:55:40

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter