Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Padma Lochan Pradhan vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 438 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 438 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2025

Orissa High Court

Padma Lochan Pradhan vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite ... on 9 May, 2025

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                             WP(C) No.12987 of 2025
            Padma Lochan Pradhan          .....     Petitioner
                                                          Represented By Adv. -
                                                          Sasibhusan Jena

                                           -versus-
            State Of Odisha & Anr.                .....        Opposite Parties
                                                          Represented By Adv. -
                                                          B.K. Sahu, A.G.A.

                                  CORAM:
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
                                MOHAPATRA

                                        ORDER

09.05.2025 Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Govt. Advocate appearing for the State- Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

"Under the abovementioned facts and circumstances of the case, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs by directing the Opp.Parties to drop both the departmental proceedings initiated against the petitioner vide memo no.239 dated. 19.8.2011 and D.P.No.955/Exe dated.25.3.2014 taking into account the inquiry reports under Annexure-2 and 3 and the Judgment dated.5.12.2024 passed in Vigilance

Case i.e CTR Case No.03/2011 under Annexure-9

And further be pleased to direct the opp.parties to open the sealed cover of the petitioner and grant him promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Excise w.e,f. July 2021+ with all consequential service and financial benefits.

Or pass any order/orders as case may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity."

4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that a Disciplinary Proceeding was initiated against the present Petitioner vide memo dated 19.08.2011 under Annexure-1. He further contended that although inquiry was concluded and a report has been submitted on 30.08.2013. However, no final order has been passed by the Departmental Authority. Similarly, he further contended that in respect of another Departmental Proceeding against the Petitioner bearing D.P. Case No.255 dated 25.03.2014, the inquiry report was submitted on 20.09.2014. In the 2nd Departmental Proceeding also the inquiry report has been submitted since 20.09.2014, however, no final decision has been taken by the Departmental Authority. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that both the Departmental Proceedings are liable to be quashed on the ground of delay.

5. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand contended that although she has no instruction in the matter, however, she further submitted that in the event proceedings have not been concluded, a last opportunity be provided to the Departmental Authority to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible.

6. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the

learned counsels appearing for the parties, on a careful examination of the background facts, further keeping in view the fact that the inquiry report in both the Disciplinary Proceedings has been submitted more than a decade ago, however, no final order has been passed by Departmental Authority, such delay in passing the final order by Departmental Authority shocks the Judicial conscience. However, taking into consideration the request of the learned counsel for the State, the Departmental Authority-Opposite Party No.1 is granted four weeks' time, as a last chance, to pass the final order. In the event no such final order is passed on production of a certified copy of today's order in the aforesaid time stipulation, then it will be deemed that the proceedings have terminated in exoneration of the present petitioner. Accordingly, necessary follow steps be taken by the Opposite Parties.

7. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ application stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil

Designation: Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-May-2025 17:26:26

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter