Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharanidhar Mohanty & vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2733 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2733 Ori
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Dharanidhar Mohanty & vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ... on 17 January, 2025

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLMC No. 2077 of 2024


            Dharanidhar Mohanty &                 ....         Petitioners
            others
                                                 Mr. S.K. Lenka, Advocate

                                      -versus-

            State of Odisha and another           ....   Opposite Parties


                                                   Mr. S.J. Mohanty, ASC

                                     CORAM:

                       JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

                                   ORDER
Order No.                         17.01.2025

04.         1.       The petitioners by invoking inherent jurisdiction

of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are seeking quashing of the F.I.R. and consequential criminal proceedings in connection with Bhubaneswar Mahila P.S. Case No.89 of 2017, corresponding to C.T. Case No.1894 of 2018 pending in the court of learned SDJM, Bhubaneswar registered for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 498A/294/ 323/506/34 IPC.

2. Notice was issued to opposite party no.2 on 02.09.2024 by this Court and the notice was duly served

on her. Thereafter, on 03.10.2024, awaiting appearance on behalf of her, the matter was adjourned. Eventually, on 11.12.2024, the following order was passed:-

"1. Notice on opposite party no.2 is sufficient, but none has entered appearance on her behalf.

2. In the interest of justice, list this matter on 16.01.2025.

3. The interim order passed earlier shall continue till the next date of hearing."

3. Today the matter is again listed but none appeared for opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that opposite party no.2 is avoiding appearence before this Court for obvious reasons that she has already received the permanent alimony and her marriage with petitioner no.5 has already been dissolved, therefore she is not taking interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this circumstances, the present matter be taken up and the criminal proceeding initiated by opposite party no.2 against the petitioners may be quashed.

4. The petitioners are present in Court. They are being represented by their counsel and identified by them. They have also filed the photocopies of their self- attested Aadhaar Cards to establish their identity, which are taken on record.

5. The petitioner no.5 is the husband of opposite party no.2. The parties have settled their dispute on compromise terms. On the basis of the settlement, petitioner no.5 and opposite party no.2 approached the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar by filing C.P. No. 288 of 2018 under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent. The learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar vide its judgment dated 10.01.2019 has allowed the petitioner and dissolved the marriage between petitioner no.5 and opposite party no.2. The petitioner no.5 has also paid the permanent alimony of Rs.4.00 lakhs, which is evident from the judgment dated 10.01.2019 passed by the Family Court in C.P. No.288 of 2018, which has been placed on record as Annexure-4.

6. Mr. Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that the dispute is arising out of matrimonial discord. The parties have already settled the dispute and pursuance to the settlement petitioner no.5 and opposite party no.2 applied for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent, which has already been allowed by the Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar. Therefore, there is no legal impediment in quashing of the entire proceeding.

7. Regard being had to the aforesaid submissions made by the parties and keeping in view the judgment of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and B.S. Joshi and others v. State of Haryana and another, reported in (2003) 4 SCC 675, I am of the considered view that subjecting the petitioners to the rigors of the trial would be a futile exercise. Therefore, the petition deserves merit.

8. Accordingly, the criminal proceeding in connection with Bhubaneswar Mahila P.S. Case No.89 of 2017, corresponding to C.T. Case No.1894 of 2018 pending in the court of learned SDJM, Bhubaneswar is quashed.

9. The CRLMC is accordingly disposed of.

(S.S. Mishra) Judge Ashok

Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR JAGADEB

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter