Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Prasanna Kumari Rout vs Kotak Mahindra Bank
2025 Latest Caselaw 2571 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2571 Ori
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Smt. Prasanna Kumari Rout vs Kotak Mahindra Bank on 13 January, 2025

Bench: S.K. Sahoo, Chittaranjan Dash
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                       W.P. (C). No. 844 of 2025

                        Smt. Prasanna Kumari Rout ....             Petitioner
                                             Mr. G. Mukherji, Sr. Advocate
                                                -versus-
                        Kotak Mahindra Bank,
                        Bhubaneswar & Others               ....        Opp. Parties
        Advoc




                                  CORAM:
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
                                                 ORDER
Order No.                                       13.01.2025
  01.              1.      This   matter   is   taken      up   through   Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

3. This Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with a prayer to quash the Possession notice dated 09.12.2024 issued by the Opposite Party No.1-Kotak Mahindra Bank under Annexure-4 which is stated to have been affixed on the gate of the land of the Petitioner in the process of releasing the charge created over the land in question with a further direction to the Opposite Party No.1-Bank to unseal the land in question.

4. Mr. Goutam Mukherji Learned Sr. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner instituted Civil Suit (I) No.211 of 2016 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, First Court, Cuttack against Opp. Party No.2-Mangal Prasad Gupta and Opp. Party No.3 Sriram Pandey for declaration of right, title interest and possession over the suit scheduled-A property along with consequential reliefs. Vide judgment dated 20.03.2023, the learned Senior Civil Judge, First Court, Cuttack has been pleased to decree the suit against the defendants and the right, title, interest and possession of the plaintiff (Petitioner) over the suit scheduled-A property was declared and the defendant No.1 Mangal Prasad Gupta (Opp. Party No.2) was directed to give vacant possession of the suit premises to the Petitioner within three months and the defendants (Opp. Parties Nos. 2 & 3) were permanently restrained from entering upon the suit schedule-A land and interfering in the peaceful possession of the Petitioner in any manner after giving vacant possession of the suit premises to the Petitioner.

It is his further contention that the Petitioner whose title has been declared by the competent Civil Court was neither the borrower nor he had mortgaged

the land in question with the Opposite Party No.1-Bank whereas the Opposite Party No.3 and one Sobha Pandey are the borrowers and since they defaulted to repay the amount borrowed, the Bank proceeded to take action against them under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, but most peculiarly, the possession notice has been affixed on the gate of the land in question which exclusively belongs to the Petitioner and it no way relates to the Opposite Party No.3. Proceeding under the SARFAESI Act in respect of a property which was never mortgaged for availing loan, is illegal. It is further submitted that after such possession notice was affixed on his gate, the Petitioner sent an application to the Opposite Party No.1 indicating therein that such notice on his gate had caused undue harassment and trauma to him and it is required to be removed from the gate. However, Opposite Party No.1 has paid deaf ear to the application made by the Petitioner.

5. Issue notice to the Opposite Parties on the question of admission indicating therein that the matter shall be disposed of at the stage of admission.

Requisites for issuance of notice on the Opposite Parties by Registered Post/Speed Post with proof of delivery shall be filed within a week.

6. List this matter in the week commencing from 10.02.2025.

Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime serving the copy thereof on learned counsel for the Petitioner.

(S. K. Sahoo) Judge

(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge

02. 1. Issue notice as above.

2. Accept one set of process fee.

3. The Opposite Party-Bank is restrained to proceed on the property of the Petitioner which has been decreed in his favour by the learned Senior Civil Judge, 1st Court, Cuttack under Annexure-2 until further orders.

(S. K. Sahoo) Judge

(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge

AKPradhan/Bijay

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter