Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jayashree Barik vs State Of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2217 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2217 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Jayashree Barik vs State Of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite ... on 8 January, 2025

Author: Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench: Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                WP(C) No. 7093 of 2020
Jayashree Barik            .....       Petitioner
                                                            Mr. P.V. Balakrishna, Advocate
                                       -versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.                    .....                 Opposite Parties
                                                               Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA


                    CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
                     ORDER

08.01.2025

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard Mr. P.V. Balakrishna, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. C.K. Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-

"It is therefore most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased enough to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why:

(i) The impugned order vide Annexure-7 shall not be quashed;

and

(ii) The application vide Annexure-5 & 8 shall not be consider and direction be given to appoint the petitioner under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme within a stipulated time;

And pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as would deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case;

And for this act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray."

4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that claim of the Petitioner to get the benefit of appointment under the provisions of Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme was rejected vide the impugned communication dtd.22.02.2013 under Annexure-7 on the ground that Petitioner is the married daughter of the deceased employee.

4.1. It is contended that the issue with regard to claim of married daughter to get the benefit of appointment is no more res integra in view of the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Khirabadibala Behera Vs. Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack & Ors.

4.2. It is also contended that placing reliance on the said decision of this Court in the case of Kshirabadibala Behera, similar claim was allowed by this Court vide order dtd.01.02.2024 in W.P.(C) No. 1628 of 2024. Stand taken in Para 4 & 6 of the said order reads as follows:-

"4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the issue with regard to extension of benefit in favour of married daughter is no more res integra in view of the decision passed by this Court on 24.08.2022 in W.P.(C) No.14945 of 2015 in the case of Kshirabadi Bala Behera Vrs. Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttak and Others.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition quash the order dated 28.12.2023 under Annexure-12. While quashing the same, this Court remits the matter to O.P. No.3 to take a fresh decision on the claim of the petitioner to get the benefit of appointment in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Kshirabadi Bala Behera as cited (supra). Such a fresh decision be taken

within a period of 6 (six) weeks from the date of receipt of this order."

5. Mr. C.K. Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate also does not dispute the contention raised by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the decision rendered in the case of Kshirabadibala Behera.

6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made and taking into account the ground of rejection of Petitioner's claim that she is the married daughter of deceased employee, this Court placing reliance on the decision in the case of Kshirabadibala Behera, is inclined to quash the rejection of the Petitioner's claim so made by Opp. Party No. 2 on 22.02.2013 under Annexure-7. While quashing the same, this Court directs Opp. Party No. 2 to take a fresh decision on the claim of the Petitioner in the light of the Judgment in the case of Kshirabadibala Behera as cited (supra). Such a fresh decision be taken within a period of two (2) months with due intimation to the Petitioner.

7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter