Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Muna @ Antaryami Patra vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 11326 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11326 Ori
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2025

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Muna @ Antaryami Patra vs State Of Odisha on 15 December, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                              CRLA No.535 of 2013

              Muna @ Antaryami Patra                 ....    Appellants/
              and another                                   Petitioners

                                    Mr. D.K. Sahoo, Advocate

                                          -versus-

              State of Odisha                        ....   Respondent/
                                                            Opp. Party

                                    Mr. Sarat Chandra Pradhan,
                                    Addl. Standing Counsel

                             CORAM:
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA
                                      ORDER
Order No.                           15.12.2025

                              I.A. No.1712 of 2025
   24.              This   matter    is    taken     up   through   Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This is an application for bail of appellants/ petitioners nos.1 and 3, namely, Muna @ Antaryami Patra and Surendra Naik @ Surendranath Naik respectively.

As per the previous order dated 01.12.2025, learned counsel for the State has produced the custody certificates, which shows that petitioner no.1, Muna @ Antaryami Patra has remained in custody for

more than fifteen years and petitioner no.3, Surendra Naik @ Surendranath Naik has remained in custody for more than fifteen years. Learned counsel has also produced the jail conducts of the petitioners, which shows that there is nothing adverse against the petitioners. The custody certificates and the jail conducts of the petitioners are taken on record.

Heard.

The appellants-petitioners along with two others have been convicted under sections 460/302/307/325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand) each, in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of two months for the offence under section 460 of the Indian Penal Code, imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand) each, in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of two months for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand) each, in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of two months for the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and no separate sentence was awarded for the offence under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Baripada in S.T. Case No.13/117 of 2011-10.

Perused the impugned judgment.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the period of detention of the petitioners in judicial custody and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, the bail application of the petitioners may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there are eye witnesses to the occurrence and the evidence of the doctor (P.W.11) corroborated the evidence of the eye witnesses and the doctor has stated that the cause of death was due to shock, as a result of which injuries to vital organ like brain.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the period of detention of the petitioners in judicial custody, their jail conduct and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, we are inclined to release the petitioners on bail.

Let the appellants nos.1 and 3, namely, Muna @ Antaryami Patra and Surendra Naik @ Surendranath Naik be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees

twenty thousand) each with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The petitioners shall not indulge in any criminal activities and shall not come in contact with the family members of the deceased.

Violation of any terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

( S.S. Mishra) Judge RKM

Signed by: RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 16-Dec-2025 12:10:23

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter