Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Odisha And Others vs Balakrushna Bhanja
2025 Latest Caselaw 11320 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11320 Ori
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

State Of Odisha And Others vs Balakrushna Bhanja on 15 December, 2025

Author: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
Bench: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                   WA No.3346 of 2024

            State of Odisha and others              ....            Appellants

                                                     Represented By Adv. -
                                                        Mr. J.K. Bal, AGA
                                         -versus-

            Balakrushna Bhanja                      ....           Respondent
                                                     Represented By Adv. -
                                         Mr. Chitta Ranjan Lenka, Advocate


                         CORAM:
                         JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
                         JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

                                           ORDER

15.12.2025 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. I.A. No.8640 of 2024

03.

1. The appellants-State challenges the order dated 12.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.5500 of 2024. The appeal has been filed after a reported delay of 245 days.

2. Having gone through the reasons stated in the application explaining the delay in approaching this Court, we are satisfied that adequate reasons have been shown for condonation of delay. Otherwise it is brought to our notice that similar writ appeal has been disposed of in view of the amendment brought in Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance)Rules, 2020 in the year 2025, by coordinate Bench.

3. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. is favoured and disposed of.

4. The writ appeal has been filed by the appellant-State challenging order dated 12.03.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.5500 of 2024. The operative portion of the order dated 12.03.2024 is reproduced herein:

"xxx xxx xxx

8. In such view of the matter, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the writ application at the stage of admission by directing the Opposite Party No.3 to convene the examination the health condition of the wife of the deceased government employee. In the event it is found that the wife of the deceased government is unfit for any government job then by following the preferential list as provided in the rules the next eligible legal heir be called for and his application be considered for appointment on compassionate ground by following OCS (RA) Rules, 1990 keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malaya Nanda Sethy vrs. State of Orissa and others : reported in 2022(II) OLR(SC)-1 and State of West Bengal-v.-Debabrata Tiwri passed in Civil Appeal No.8842 of 2022 decided on 3rd of March, 2023 reported in (2023 (3) SCALE-557 decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the judgment of this Court in Suchitra Bal vs. State of Odisha & ors. by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2081 of 2021 decided on 16.03.2023 as well as Bindusagar Samantaray vs. State of Odisha & ors. by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No.810 of 2021 decided on 25.09.2023. Further, it is directed that on production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today, the Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to consider the matter afresh without being influenced by any earlier decision and further he shall consider the case of the Petitioner on any of the family members of the deceased govt. employees

strictly in terms of the OCS (RA) Rules, 1990 by during regard to the observations made hereinabove within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of a certified copy of this order. The final decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.3 be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of taking such final decision.

xxx xxx xxx"

5. Both the sides in all fairness submit that now vide notification dated 4th April, 2025 a suitable amendment is effected to the provisions of Rule 2 to Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 2020. The amended provision to Rule 6 of the said Rules has the following text :

"2. In the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules,2020 (hereinafter referred to as the "said rules"), in rule 6,--

(i) for sub-rule (9), the following sub-rule shall be substituted, namely :--

"(9) (a) All pending applications, relating to death of Government employee prior to the date of commencement of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 2020 shall be dealt in accordance with the rules prevailing on the date of death of Government employee for appointment under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme:

Provided that in case the death of Government employee occurred on or after commencement of the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance)Amendment Rules, 2016 and before commencement of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance)Rules, 2020, shall be governed by the provisions of the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance)Rules, 1990."

6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits and we agree that his client will be satisfied if his case is considered under the new legal regime as reflected in the subject notification.

Learned Additional Government Advocate too agrees that the case of respondent shall be considered under the amended Rules within an outer limit of five months. Both the sides agree that all contentions need to be kept open for being treated by the competent authority under the amended provisions of the subject extant rules. This is fair. It hardly needs to be stated that since the case would be considered afresh, all records that effected rejection of claim of the respondent are hereby voided.

7. In view of the above, appeal is disposed of. The respondent/writ petitioner shall submit certified copy of this order along with all the relevant documents before the appellant no.3- Chief District Medical & Public Health Officer, Koraput obtaining necessary acknowledgement with date and seal from the said authority in that regard. The Chief District Medical & Public Health Officer shall deal with the representation/application of the respondent/writ petitioner by himself or shall forward the same to the appropriate authority for necessary action as indicated above. We make it clear that in the event matter is not decided as undertaken before us within the specified period, the competent authority who has to take the decision shall pay ₹500/- to the respondent for delay per day for the first month and ₹1,000/- for the period next following.

Now, no costs.


                                                               (Manash Ranjan Pathak)
                                                                        Judge


Digitally Signed                                              (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Reason: Authentication                                                Judge
Location: OHC
Date: 22-Dec-2025 14:11:43

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter