Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Soumyaranjan Parida vs State Of Odisha & Another .... Opp. ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 16121 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16121 Ori
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Orissa High Court

Soumyaranjan Parida vs State Of Odisha & Another .... Opp. ... on 23 October, 2024

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                        CRLMC No.3251 of 2024

             Soumyaranjan Parida               ....         Petitioner

                                           Mr. P.R.Singh, Advocate

                                    -versus-

             State of Odisha & another         ....       Opp. Parties

                                           Mr. B.K. Ragada, AGA
                                   Mr. A.K. Rout, Advocate for the
                                              opposite party no.2


         CORAM:
               JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Order                              ORDER
 No.                             23.10.2024
 02.    1.     Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the instance of the opposite party no.2, the F.I.R., i.e., Motanga P.S. Case No.260 of 2022 came to be registered against the petitioner under Sections 294/506 of the IPC read with Section 3(2)(va) of the S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act pending in the Court of learned Judge, Special Court, Dhenkanal.

3. The prosecution case is that on 12.11.2022, the informant/opposite party no.2 lodged a written report before the IIC, Motanga Police Station alleging therein that while she along with her family members returned from Hindol road market, one Pintu Parida abused her in filthy languages and misbehaved her. Thereafter, he assaulted her. When her son protested, the accused also assaulted him and abused him by his caste. Hence, the F.I.R. was registered.

4. The petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present in the Court today along with their respective counsel and identified by them. They have also filed their self attested copies of the Aadhaar Cards to establish their identity, which are taken on record.

5. On the query from the Court, the informant/opposite party no.2, who is present in the Court, has stated that she has already settled the dispute with the petitioner on the intervention of the well wishers and village gentries. Therefore, she seeks to quash the entire criminal proceeding initiated by her against the petitioner.

6. The petitioner and opposite party no.2 have filed joint affidavit dated 13.09.2024, inter alia, stating as under:

"2. That after submission of charge-sheet the leaned Judge, Special Court, SC/ST, Dhenkanal pleased to take cognizance of offences against the petitioner vide order dated 07.01.2023 and thereafter summoned to the accused to appear before the court.

3. That during pendency of the aforesaid criminal proceeding, the dispute have been amicably settled between the informant (opposite party no.2) and the accused-petitioner at their locality in presence of the village gentries and well wishers of both the parties.

4. That, since the dispute among the parties have already amicably settled and all of them now are living peaceful and maintaining cordial relationship in their locality and if the proceeding is continuing it will be affected the good relationship between the parties.

5. That, opposite party no.2 and the petitioner do not want to proceed with the case further since the dispute have been settled between the parties in their locality."

7. Mr. Ragada, learned counsel for the State submits that the parties have settled their dispute and the informant does not want to proceed with the case against the petitioner. Therefore, in the peculiarity of the present case, this Court can give indulgence as there is no legal impediment.

8. Regard being had to the aforementioned circumstances and since the opposite party no.2 is not willing to proceed against the petitioner, the present petition is squarely covered by the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and B.S. Joshi & others vs. State of Haryana & another reported in (2003) 4 SCC 675. Since subjecting the petitioners to the rigors of trial will be a futile exercise, I am inclined to quash the criminal proceeding.

9. In view of the aforementioned facts of the case and submissions made at bar, Motanga P.S. Case No.260 of 2022 corresponding to C.T. (Special) Case No.78 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Judge, Special Court, Dhenkanal and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner are quashed.

10. The CRLMC is accordingly disposed of.

(S.S. Mishra) Judge

amit

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter