Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3929 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
LAA No.61 of 2022
Angul Sukinda Railway ..... Appellant
Limited, Bhubaneswar
Mr. P. Das, Advocate
Vs.
Lenkudi Sahu and others ..... Respondents
Mr. S. Pradhan, Advocate
(for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 6)
Mr. B. Panigrahi, ASC
(for Respondent No.13)
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
01.03.2024 Order No. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
11.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Parties.
3. Mr. Pradhan, learned Counsel for the private Respondents, relying on the judgment of this Court reported in AIR 1991 Orissa 252 (The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee vs. Brundaban Chandra Hota and others) submits, the present Appellant Company has no right to challenge the impugned judgment passed by the Court below, as held by this Court. The Appellant Company cannot claim to be added as a party to a land acquisition proceeding either before the Collector or before the Court. Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure will not assist such a Company in view of the provisions enshrined under Section 50(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The judgment filed by the learned Counsel for the private Respondents be kept on record.
4. Mr. Das, learned Counsel for the Appellant is directed to take instruction in terms of the order dated 03.04.2023 so also with regard to the averments made in the Additional Affidavit and the documents appended thereto, to substantiate such pleadings made in the Additional Affidavit before the next date.
5. Matter be listed in the week commencing from 18.03.2024 along with the connected matters, which are on board.
(S.K. MISHRA)
pcd JUDGE
Designation: Personal Assistant
Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 03-Mar-2024 13:38:55
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!