Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ghanashyam Meher vs State Of Odisha (Vig.)
2023 Latest Caselaw 89 Ori

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 89 Ori
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023

Orissa High Court
Ghanashyam Meher vs State Of Odisha (Vig.) on 3 January, 2023
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                           CRLA No. 1229 of 2022

              Ghanashyam Meher                     ....      Appellant

                                  Mr. Sudipto Panda, Advocate

                                        -versus-

              State of Odisha (Vig.)               ....    Respondent

                                  Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das,
                                  Standing Counsel (Vig.)

                                  CORAM:
                             JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                                    ORDER

Order No. 05.01.2023

01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Vigilance Department submitted that he has received the copy of the appeal memo along with the impugned judgment and interim applications for bail and stay realization of fine and he will file his appearance memo by 20.01.2023.

In case such appearance memo is filed, the same be taken on record and the name of Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department shall be reflected in the cause list as well as at the top of the brief.

Heard.

// 2 //

Admit.

Call for the trial Court record.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

I.A. No. 2366 of 2022

02. This is an application under section 389 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

Heard.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted under section 7 read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period six months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) in default, to undergo R.I. for a period of one month for the offence under section 7 of the P.C. Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of three months for the offence under section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge - cum- Special Judge (Vigilance), Bhawanitpatna in T.R. Case No. 14 of 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was on bail during trial and he has

// 3 //

never misutilised his liberty and the substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial Court against the petitioner is for one year and after conviction, he has also been released on bail by the learned trial Court and there are good chances of success in the appeal and there is no chance of early hearing of appeal in the near future and balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioner and therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be favourably considered.

Learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature of evidence adduced by the prosecution during trial, the sentence imposed by the learned trial Court, the fact that the petitioner was on bail during trial and there is no allegation of misutilization of his liberty while on bail and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, the prayer for bail is allowed.

Let the appellant-petitioner on surrendering be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

// 4 //

The I.A. is disposed of.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

I.A. No. 2365 of 2022

03. Heard.

There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellant- petitioner till disposal of the criminal appeal.

The I.A. is disposed of.

A free copy of this order be handed over to Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

I.A. No. 2367 of 2022

04. This is an application for stay of the order of conviction.

Learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department seeks some time to file objection to the application for stay of the order of conviction.

List this matter in the week commencing from 20th February 2022.

Objection, if any, be filed in the meantime

// 5 //

giving copy thereof to the learned counsel for the appellant.

A free copy of this order be handed over to Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter